Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor
"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 21:51 UTC
Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3546D130E90 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofsMWnu4VDII for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D92D131175 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id a132-v6so12430971qkg.3 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=SUNs/5unWbDpJSdlGYTDI3TiENovpHnOiGjV7ffwvwQ=; b=ai7kK4KaPVi97SOvkwf9g4YlxXnlcNy+JjiLGxeZNbC8TYCktJ4RXs9h+tAXzbOQNZ E1e1jsLCx95I58BmOaytc9HtDqmpnSKqXtk1yODT/LztfHrTEuqe9iSfWDOk3GaolFDm 9W7n/L99yneMJAbuEqtzP1cPfRsKvYVdO5XbCBSSKRO8PS2by1DpUN7PiQpBFbzGTung xsY1QMk5fU7SdmksS2l4IuGAXs7e0of5CBW9WzdTxjKEqRkc4giO/DGMpex5OeU7kJlz wtRHY6WsTWw8lTV9rZ6aZL/AKikbzWJwy3TmrMtgdihq6d3SMtNasp24nnOwxGFj38W+ hc3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=SUNs/5unWbDpJSdlGYTDI3TiENovpHnOiGjV7ffwvwQ=; b=clP7o3oI8CFixcJ87C2C07fqSHKhZTwke29/pf2ELnIH18mhARBWp6LSAe0QsaSu3K v/F5+mTp9kYjEz0N4pmIaUKVCA3M2t20RASLYbQzwT320JuRp9SsyzHTlcg2LBziTgtG P7VRB3pArEMe+4bzVkkyRp3oZOsJijfgL3vKWj3qsYpegThZ7FSrBmsoJ4KOmrMXerJ5 awvQ//Gg3NwVKkhY94gOIml37gbwWDWSBibUp/CuUgsGMfTYikD1XpUnDxuj/ldOoz5w stgwgbgwLQKgOs8V6v+Bcli0gISuBpOlPHbM3rXIFIHgtyGe+Bk7Q+DqHpAJzxa2hjQU yQQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2hjVoX2ByP5snRKZ+GMJLGp8fqVW8MnE5bovF2ZhUNNidYnd27 LZLEJTV0B0qWqKACZFsraLg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd3iTRKcX8bsB1D6YMTBhwyc+GzQWIAoO2lPaSJL9xKPgWPAmEaxIqkWGmFRviM0Cbsgb3vkw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:d7c5:: with SMTP id t66-v6mr22789686qkt.51.1531259472494; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.33.154] ([2001:4878:a000:3000:f826:7a2c:984c:1004]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y132-v6sm1638286qkb.56.2018.07.10.14.51.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Cc: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:51:10 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.11.2r5507)
Message-ID: <0A89510C-0D20-4BD4-AEE5-2568E4EB853E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <06a2ec62-8c83-cc0f-9b28-c285f7b77602@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBVC82qy0hbUbQKm=OsFPsaJUPndtVaxd782au6Qy0w6Q@mail.gmail.com> <a4b50286-5c54-e6cf-9087-7171030b7fca@juniper.net> <C9EBFF44-DB93-45E4-954D-2AC5E2F47D03@gmail.com> <20180710192810.GQ20282@mx4.yitter.info> <0e127473-902a-2421-6b5d-73f9e7f83286@juniper.net> <CA+9kkMDwOuLOJMzBSowqga-6s0GnO=03PBScOaHRcJT0+QYicw@mail.gmail.com> <1F7626CA-FB10-402A-BCF3-EA89526AC63C@gmail.com> <06a2ec62-8c83-cc0f-9b28-c285f7b77602@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_2235CE2F-9B01-4445-B131-F40DE9507F4F_="
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/I5jV9th8NX94q_2fc794WkuGzV8>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 21:51:22 -0000
On 10 Jul 2018, at 17:49, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 7/10/18 12:23 PM, Aaron Falk wrote: >> As the IRTF chair when this stream was formalized I should point out >> that an important reason for RGs to publish RFCs is the same reason >> that >> they are RGs in the first place: to have their work be adjacent, >> influence, and possibly migrate to the IETF. Of course, that is not >> the >> only reason we have RGs but it is a good reason to have non-standards >> track output in similar format & repositories as the IETF. > > It's also probably worth mentioning that academics produce output > other than research papers, and we've got at least one instance of > a researcher who's got a protocol spec they'd like to see published > as an RFC through the IRTF. It's already been submitted as a draft > and that draft has led to the start of several independent > implementations, and may be used as foundational technology for > other work. There's at least some value to academics in having > an I-related publication stream available, independent of whether > or not an RFC carries the same stature as peer-reviewed publication. Indeed. I would say this is a very common case. Researchers know the RFC series isn't the place to publish original research. --aaron
- [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Bob Hinden
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Bob Hinden
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Melinda Shore
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- [Rfcplusplus] What would the ISE publish [Was: Co… RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor S Moonesamy
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor S Moonesamy
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Martin Thomson
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Martin Thomson
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor S Moonesamy
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk