IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] A note on tonight's plenary

heather flanagan <hlflanagan@gmail.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <hlflanagan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB734130FDF; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtcROQu_0Gaf; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BF4130EC8; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v71-v6so6119929itb.3; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DE9Up3pjRkiLm3179QYdbuUZ+A6iF6sKz57YYowrm1Q=; b=TADCORxy2I8U47HspwQ8HKH6LexEN5J39sjg3AHvXSpVsYsbr1kfa2pqbbwYHzbTvV BDTzPwX5VlGJQnlqklz1rGRc8OEJDqdn5VSOS7ruGGAl9eGoTZ6w1erIRpeIWqXnZMSr fr3Kk7kvlNiXdnB8s/nMRTDYMhGd9LZ2DcgB8rDU6VFF+ALesGFBT1U20aTfA70e3fIf OSIdE1bcjb6dTOpwYUU0DLRQPobYNjThesaIT4Eg8RrCerawejVyb7xQwJMPQMDAEXGX 1CafSLx/Hb2s9zyFJtUmGctBxdYi7uxyFohPB7mbni3G6S2b26OlxGeLghQfNVaD9Lnn NQ6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DE9Up3pjRkiLm3179QYdbuUZ+A6iF6sKz57YYowrm1Q=; b=qeSxyofoRk1vzVkg0lN0TxYzHd47BadT91Px/9NPBjOiOWeoz12yoAtIq/xmDqjo7x EyLjIPDIxtYqJSPXiw/RR+xeQaanTgJxsG7iMvRfGPELKXpF7SaZq4PlLDW1SU8SC3Z0 qIID7Vf0kv2dVSukjSO7MreEJdVUqpQPQhL+xvC0GfHMc9zFSlim1xMuJviaR8iwDrFX QbahkarG7D4r0baRKpKpvG8Y5mSk1o9RcmPOGLW+fJsa32E3Nl4epP7Lr/aofV8gpSg1 E43FPtLA0IoIiY4krBnCDCdnNnEpgVI++uGwr9ZCuPFlfUO+1tDjMVMshiWvdSJfeyl7 9+FQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGePMZSWw/Ptvj5sRUnKNSkC2/YkCRaWSHq4B+BCjtm/WbQH5OK eZU0qYGtOQJ8phD4oiPU3+g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfqTyx/5iIMjV9RkD0cTjNJA44JWH9VFoHxVDvP8CfnGZImyu7Q983S64NEGSD0nA0UCbJskQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:970a:: with SMTP id x10-v6mr6885291jai.137.1531944800075; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:b568:48b0:f7f3:d8f8? ([2001:67c:370:128:b568:48b0:f7f3:d8f8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b15-v6sm1909302itb.25.2018.07.18.13.13.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: heather flanagan <hlflanagan@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <a819c946-a747-29a0-b397-a1542c6576fe@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:13:18 -0400
Cc: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38356279-C4B7-4322-AAFC-06E4FE8982F8@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBcTB=Pqa1SwyCqrqcxaDdXO5unGq_jy1mP+TTFpmK+oA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU1Z9P6JGJpk53YOGF-DLro1C03xUpLFMWjk8d29effOYg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMD1nev2OG9ePAKr2+s0G0MQGhxMdnjFm3S6PDS=eg21MA@mail.gmail.com> <F72911DA-BFA8-4A91-BD26-CA7EA4AA8B25@rfc-editor.org> <a819c946-a747-29a0-b397-a1542c6576fe@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/JaQUzjg83Q5iXnc2NnfmqWcJlLc>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] A note on tonight's plenary
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:13:23 -0000


> On Jul 18, 2018, at 16:06, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the detailed outline, Heather! I have one bit of feedback.
> 
> 
>> On 7/18/18 15:34, Heather Flanagan wrote:
>> The IETF community can also expect me to be reaching out to see if I can find contacts within some of the big companies that reference our documents to see what they know (or think they know) about RFCs and how they would expect to find out about changes to the series.
> 
> In the interest of completeness, I would suggest that such an effort needs to include reaching out to the communities associated with open-source projects as well.
> 

ooooh, excellent idea! Thanks! If you have any particular communities and/or contacts in mind, please drop me a note off list.

It occurs to me, as I continue to think about this, that groups like the NOGs, the RIRs, and other operator groups should be on the list, too.

-Heather

> /a
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email