IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5571310C3 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id evnbYZeqw-gv for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15A1130DE1 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id n84-v6so45381728oib.9 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XTNBfuHRmMC+19juqQvwvd1CitiDu7T/mR7RYAbT1Qs=; b=Qjy8eqVvij4uVfDMasIPnUYTtLnu9DHaViu3ATVwhWyRmiRE1Gb68wzKgBI0BZaky4 2/YHlC68WbjpHXcMQBFBIg0u4Q8iGMheJvdJs8PMN2+8NLL9khqxzku5pnWWG//dcayA QslRVF96t0T9bpIqcxyS4/Wbc75vx1obfWRcYR6LckO6WojLt2ylWJ9PwADDx3Hefkgc OOFCDNYEeX7zloe86XgGNJjdwGwWGqfMVSetcnIHOwUeEGbWv0MxQ7wA58sko3X09lZN UmefAosFYsblXEWlJFThLkc6ix5xIATfWP+UuSCiBmq00T4B+f6ADLpo5yO0jvlBmKbR LZ3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XTNBfuHRmMC+19juqQvwvd1CitiDu7T/mR7RYAbT1Qs=; b=AkX5hftqfBhCCOG+qeJjxJj5fSQWEZbX5Guy3f7lUhEqnTdR2ZB6uH20zNrXMG1OIh UEcTP+KBshASYm89aSrfSFFNPGBnNg5xyZljp29/Gn0dhvXq4CXGDFUaZITvBBeeSLAy TRLHV+5VBCnKBUdDa4iLKj0PlmDB2bwmlPZX6qBUle33eTCBSyLZwfu5s7GgHqAISOBD bpsFCnu27RxlmHyIutKGLA86qGOMzoSsMdvdpFHvsBUWjVkLmLruFSWcGiXZoSnC5oJz 7SfZ096oEmb9h7yDbPGp5UfFCkKtih3QbLu9FTj2EfKWuV9TaqMz9Ynf4jvpY3Ssa0xx sjkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2kFIMgdTnI+UTsJpwz7JQiYHDdY+tX5sG66JkMFLkg8UVRMoh0 I/7WN6y0mFuyEbRosmM6NiQB9gpX6a7sP6Ve+gw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeKNv+NZGtvB3mODFNxCVfGKNs/DSuZ9XGIh+S+DB2aCCvnY2CAfgYO6GmlNcGSZzqQt0yzPqtOLwEaTcQkWMQ=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3c45:: with SMTP id j66-v6mr27312588oia.118.1531257216054; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:66d9:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1F7626CA-FB10-402A-BCF3-EA89526AC63C@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBVC82qy0hbUbQKm=OsFPsaJUPndtVaxd782au6Qy0w6Q@mail.gmail.com> <a4b50286-5c54-e6cf-9087-7171030b7fca@juniper.net> <C9EBFF44-DB93-45E4-954D-2AC5E2F47D03@gmail.com> <20180710192810.GQ20282@mx4.yitter.info> <0e127473-902a-2421-6b5d-73f9e7f83286@juniper.net> <CA+9kkMDwOuLOJMzBSowqga-6s0GnO=03PBScOaHRcJT0+QYicw@mail.gmail.com> <1F7626CA-FB10-402A-BCF3-EA89526AC63C@gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:13:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAdth-wiCxMbmuXQKRY08FoPz0+0H=OLaNEyrYAymw7FQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c3be90570ab9a75"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/M5ECXKK8b-iukpqboo3R2S1u75M>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 21:13:46 -0000

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:

> IIRC, the copyrights for IRTF stream RFCs default to permit publication
> elsewhere to allow for easy submission in more-recognized forums.
>

Well, you're the author of the relevant doc, so I hesitate to cite it to
you, but the text is in RFC 5743 and in
https://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF-Trust-License-Policy.pdf.  Basically,
though, the individuals retain their own copyright (along with the Trust
Copyright, managed by the IETF Trust at the request of the IRTF).  They can
re-submit.

> Finally, I haven't seen anyone present that helping IRTF output get more
> recognition is a goal of this activity. Is someone asking for this?
>

It's been a discussion between IRTF folk and the IAB for some time.  It
could, of course, be a separate activity from this experiment.

Ted


> --aaron
>

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status