Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 July 2018 02:14 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4201310D3 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWDFbFy7WrDN for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x235.google.com (mail-pf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A613D130EB2 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b17-v6so17343241pfi.0 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X+nw7ZXYwbcOKtmuJ5g5QL/LLabQKqtZji9v9y7+bGE=; b=mXR5AL6f/b6rX7oYFa8q1nHUHhrH4u53kVFVDAKkwOVatCu89CART+iC1V3Cxae8xr tiOUH9XbnOMX92Mxq9cBnXF0TMIcQMfZAlLYk3b/4iUS8U9zQKg4a1h9TFfu7UQMuTRP TItL8QnX+egfuiyW/Lxn4qK02Wg0yNHqn54v3zoeMGyOtHNtwhWsSWV/LeSvNBs4r4zS 3FtP9MvC2z/tfwxkK32/TGIKMyRkjYWKFQGFnv2u2+vA8c/7e6hrRauSNyLY7pDe82io 2aymLPJOfcIJ5G+e8SvKivTaal4/DOs/uHHpWhuD/JZHiyK6OzMPuan8Gnp1BXC7Ijzh csxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X+nw7ZXYwbcOKtmuJ5g5QL/LLabQKqtZji9v9y7+bGE=; b=MZuM4mTWUbNWHloGKFwh21xSuPji3dwAC+CoRuuszflP5pgLlkJYAoTQcdfelm8FBa yO+8FRtP1YXLEURl1B3f8wS3ox0gm/YkLU/0WA2hkxd+dllm7TDluN7OV9R2y5vbk0aH 1poIiyuhwMsSsSXovoY1yGoXDq+/DJ81PD+FEa/mXR/WuN3owo1GPRT2YWFTNmFOg2Cz p7ogU1BnXdizHdCclbkPDVAYCZuQtECjWNHzprCW8pegu4D0hmOgHsYHOxv17EWD3VPl MP6LXVLPWVPfbanjvDIdk2QqT5MLVTDsGfV2u5Knr8ytrTOmwO5GYN623I3cBNI1urYS BcwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3DpjPcbNfgtQ7kJKnio3YscXYvPNeZut7JmXwlJyco48Rm2GP0 jjPElMYNtSwQ4RpN+6fLCqdZKQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdn7ojkCFhVot2xPy/0hHGd96i29gKqrvzuERNGnTKLo+6dOVczIalV/K3tXZhCr16tZgTpHQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6e0a:: with SMTP id j10-v6mr18927860pgc.321.1531275287994; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.38] ([118.148.121.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j129-v6sm33211359pfb.113.2018.07.10.19.14.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMBVC82qy0hbUbQKm=OsFPsaJUPndtVaxd782au6Qy0w6Q@mail.gmail.com> <a4b50286-5c54-e6cf-9087-7171030b7fca@juniper.net> <C9EBFF44-DB93-45E4-954D-2AC5E2F47D03@gmail.com> <20180710192810.GQ20282@mx4.yitter.info> <0e127473-902a-2421-6b5d-73f9e7f83286@juniper.net> <20180710204512.GT20282@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <af1d2bc2-2027-0a4b-856a-35b35c386624@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:14:49 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180710204512.GT20282@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/MCvp6v1dkP5pgJg_urQnzdZOPSo>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 02:14:58 -0000
On 11/07/2018 08:45, Andrew Sullivan wrote: ... > Others seem to be arguing that the RFC series should in fact welcome > anything on any topic, Really? I haven't seen that and it seems like a strawman to me. The Independent stream has criteria that have already been mentioned here; relevance to the Internet and surviving peer review are among them. > and as long as they can find someone willing to > let them in, there's no reason they shouldn't be in the RFC series too > (i.e. we shouldn't prohibit people "from publishing RFCs when they > want to do so and find it valuable to do so"). It is an interesting > question whether, if I wanted to publish an RFC about Wittgenstein's > remarks on colour, whether the ISE would consider it. We do have the > April 1st ones, after all. But even they are tested for relevance to the Internet and are peer reviewed, just not in public for fairly obvious reasons. Brian
- [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Bob Hinden
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Bob Hinden
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Melinda Shore
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk
- [Rfcplusplus] What would the ISE publish [Was: Co… RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Ted Hardie
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor S Moonesamy
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor S Moonesamy
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Martin Thomson
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Martin Thomson
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor S Moonesamy
- Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor Aaron Falk