Re: [Rfcplusplus] draft-klensin-rfcplusplus-alternatives-00

Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 14 July 2018 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8216130E08 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dsKI6F5iE7XD for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5595130DD0 for <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEB61C907C; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3wadqF3GfUq; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.119.75.38] (unknown [23.81.209.167]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC7711C6632; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <1986638168567223C132B119@PSB>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:52:30 -0400
Cc: Rfcplusplus@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4F906BDF-CDD4-488A-B057-BCBCE877E48B@rfc-editor.org>
References: <1986638168567223C132B119@PSB>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/S1TUjl2fnQEnpUJbkYd35wVp5xA>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] draft-klensin-rfcplusplus-alternatives-00
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 16:52:35 -0000


> On Jul 14, 2018, at 10:02, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> ...
> 
> Alissa agreed to allowing it to be posted between the cutoff and
> Monday if I sent it to her.  I did that at around 19:48 UTC
> yesterday.  It apparently has not been posted yet, I assume
> because of the very busy schedule of the IETF Chair.  If she
> continues to not have time, I'll post it to this list late
> afternoon Montreal time today and then just go through the
> normal procedure for the repository.
> 

FYI, I just saw Alissa. She’s sent the draft on to the Secretariat for posting. 

-Heather

> I hope at least a few people find it helpful.
> 
> best,
>    john
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rfcplusplus mailing list
> Rfcplusplus@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus
>