Re: [Rfcplusplus] IRTF stream considerations

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 14 July 2018 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1078130EF9 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NugwvFwmcJU5 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F151130E12 for <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 188-v6so15318693ita.5 for <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=POpCJ3dKy/NYEZQp63K1nxKZYs2QWlKSVr0oafqNEQ8=; b=egwEj78QWXXal1+WUWsZ1FKwuM4HKiKER50RqgiAJzeNHHMxDwtbVBGagmu1jl8Xcm 4UEZNBT3pXRqop9o8iW38fkNSgx2Q5pDgCmo8KOgW9FlxYN3fwlpD7xCMol8eGN7m/VQ oLrBNKNo+Cm979ESARFVA1zL65tt51/FeF/u2+kfIk/zUwLFaLy1lGEOuNwaGJEdms8i aY/G5vsOULFUvzKBKnc5DTgO6gPeUkAjvSFdNEX50ndwzS/2Oj+yMP7xsc2/g132sRJ5 smq4K4Oq3s7vxwPW0EMRoREKJ3R/U13i3QQnWBook40/Ok+Dw8S7cYpTTgFV3TRkm4l4 dJgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=POpCJ3dKy/NYEZQp63K1nxKZYs2QWlKSVr0oafqNEQ8=; b=T8fKecZ1t/wOtJ+dSz7LQir5BXqEVDvm8jftHgrnKb+VbP9IdUKUceZjmTy5uis3Pk 8i9AwF/2vI7/h86ADEaIJ6YNn7XW/e7MOVC4H01+z7hd6YoI6SmSLfOWssev+Vfi11bF GBaO+/1cYKdq92srKhMi3r5KD3P58WtNJWJkVfMXb3oVD1/7o34946P/7XjnceSY5zbN 2HGXe3Ek6f8Osy+pK9H2s+wWTaeet/ufAxJwo7Yyff7FskN3Gq6KZPTmGX/HoguvbNDH tXyXIQ8cWrV517FzGhBrTv4EF9pPNnsaJ00OMPQ15WiugcOfQcnWno3T+QEXND3GrL/l nBHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHY/HNxaybZBnulkbU7CIZn4xq2cdKYG9+B4sUAhNfA2VOGmiEW 0Dm5zYLtdCvDHRqABcbjSxcwMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeak43CQuHIrQ+5q8X2hpN/mMdx9ZaiE7ADp6CXOT1cc9T9psCwIDhT/kEz6qE/fHd8/1qJVQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:8895:: with SMTP id n21-v6mr8920384jaj.21.1531582097433; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.255.239.101] ([207.164.22.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q5-v6sm8204399iop.12.2018.07.14.08.28.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>, "Rfcplusplus@ietf.org" <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
References: <CAP8yD=vm+jRxdi3ZUncoFZNDYKOQKvFaphT7gxb5o1tDXWmumA@mail.gmail.com> <b69b370c-317b-284f-85d1-1353c67a3043@gmail.com> <8f98deb9-7ed3-3303-356a-e6d3dc5a80c0@nostrum.com> <08e8650b-2f33-943e-ddcb-a6bf6c45b2ce@gmail.com> <c2c450a6-4f14-6325-8c54-6ecee4e0983f@nostrum.com> <22b91a2a-82ff-af78-4b79-c58eb305cec6@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCP+66+dxcukbG4BN24heH5oVHP6fJB0tZ3xA+Gsc2-QQ@mail.gmail.com> <0eefb84e-1a2b-4bbe-9e33-35a49b4db161@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAkxcPttoa6oXaE_HECvb-d1nqj+h1Ke3W3qXbtAqVNZA@mail.gmail.com> <97585f4a-1761-762c-83d7-15284364e46e@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAgfDS6nVeVHaqu-=_MdDeMzAvni4Pv0FUeMD9F-jomLg@mail.gmail.com> <47e90834-aa80-3325-920e-8bcc12c604d2@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCB2_cAiz_Hj-fJ_8=fF+O+JTFxabOTeWKWgrWf+WJ5rg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e19c9541-9c0c-24aa-8b23-b95496513826@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 03:28:15 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCB2_cAiz_Hj-fJ_8=fF+O+JTFxabOTeWKWgrWf+WJ5rg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/WOI_1Dijm0H9ARRWj8XO506pPxQ>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] IRTF stream considerations
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:28:20 -0000

Well, in British, chucking out is what the bouncer does to you when you annoy the other drinkers in a pub. I don't think it's a bad analogy. Anyway, let's aim at a polite and productive discussion Monday afternoon.

Regards
   Brian

On 14/07/2018 02:34, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Howdy,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     > The proposed difference is in the label which is applied during
>     > the experiment, nothing more.
> 
>     They would be denied the use of the abbreviation RFC and an RFC number
>     in the series that was started in 1969, and presumably therefore
>     of the ISSN number and a DOI in the same family.
> 
>     That is chucking out of the RFC series as far as I'm concerned. It
>     couldn't be plainer.
> 
>     Regards
>        Brian
> 
> 
> Well, language is a funny thing, and it may well evolve to where this meaning is common.  Who knows?  It may even evolve to the point where the barkeeps in Westerns have the bouncers experimentally relabel bad guys through plate glass windows for comic effect.* 
> 
> In the mean time, I must disagree with this characterization.  As an author of a document recently adopted by one of the relevant streams, I don't think relabeling the document would chuck me out of the conversation, and, even if it has the effect of muting my voice, the aim of the experiment is to rollback the status of any documents which experience that impact.
> 
> regards,
> 
> Ted
> 
> *At the time of writing the Urban Dictionary had no direct entry for "chucking out", so there is the opportunity to enter "experimentally relabel" there, if you care to.  At the worst, it would mean you could buy a mug with your definition on it.
> 
>