Re: [Rfcplusplus] Conversation as metaphor

[Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> Ted,
>
> It would be on topic if there was a proposal inside the IRTF to change
> the publication venue for IRTF output. But this is an IETF BOF so all
> we can do is discuss how IETF stream documents are published.
>
> I know this is an inconvenient truth for some people, but there it is.
>
>     Brian
>

If  you have a suggestion for a label that would help communicate that this
meeting involves all of the streams, I think we can get it applied and
communicated quickly.  Practically speaking, though, the co-location of
this meeting with the IETF, the ANRW/IRTF, and the IAB gives us  a large
number of contributors across many streams.  Adrian, as ISE, will also be
present.  The conflicts with this meeting within IETF 102 were strictly
minimized, and  I'm not sure how we could get a better opportunity to
discuss it in a face-to-face meeting.  Of course, the BoF has also given us
a chance to have this discussion on a dedicated mailing list. (In a reply
to a question which is almost certain to arise, Heather asked that we not
hold this on rfc-interest, because a large number of RFC format issues were
expected to be discussed at roughly the same time, and she did not think
interleaving them would be a good idea).

regards,

Ted