Re: [Rfcplusplus] Rfcplusplus BOF next steps?

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E79D130E46 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6dLZR57v9f9w for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FDA2129C6B for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s9-v6so663638wmh.3 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=tilTrsj78Ksgrkj0umMdJo+7Uw1/0eBnSL0SxeoG+3o=; b=VjHEXhpeyaG2fXrnChUfhelNhKX0u6JG/rOntpxse/nLq4cb3FBPzzss0n5PQ8zE/T XZufdz1Jd+00eeckX/MK9hc0kJp9n1tfU/k3zPzpBGMyuH9b6IlG7OZEnaOxUy/XhIPW sEGkdMOqIo7BtbKAz2TdyXFozI/o7Wr0BNoldtSOxcCsa3Z6hkw2M43Saj1WHqf9xJSK jNjBya6FpnJml+dJWP18P7ypdjfDJD2JqOxbrqCJyO3wvQ9tPIKo8XMcZj7FGx32tBAp hRmvfSTCF0zn3pePp89knM6H+qmmw7SrAyeDAVE5tOYM8ikV5KsNeD5dzG32Mf3pzo1K RjUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=tilTrsj78Ksgrkj0umMdJo+7Uw1/0eBnSL0SxeoG+3o=; b=ZC6sjIGRMR2W7yLTBX0h04jyKHY0UmCCotm91RDkGqi990SBzFxlsDMsAOCRYmBTQ9 qMiOSe8AfeiuP4jHZVYv1JiSg6nbJ2e/xC9R/Og0DsJ69w9NWn9h1cai68fEcs16plbo fGPn12Q4JwQJdgyfSYUt3S0ucWXE9bccMFsb6x+GzSn/WCb7lY2rDeA3PUaWTKVmuDX9 5Ou1V2u/jJI1XYiYyKmBcrv6bWb2PF4w7/rapZJVh09HP8iNxmSIoDHERkZ3o9fyDL9W C8AwT2DjBA9wzRZ8TZiUOSYieN88vZ/t+PYLOBKueszXXhL78z2cI0WwK7SHjpfxTmHz X9mQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHKz9XMHExE+PIgDjs35Tml8J0Qg7Og+YU4Gkb8RacheXM/y3ZQ 8X2ASLr/RcTLUS/sCm7dOPo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd80E5L46NqZNXE1iTuEEd4s116fNy/UZ+xpMcN5337+/PEAcc4itfv1taBK8RKptvFIEaYBg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1a02:: with SMTP id a2-v6mr2522949wma.52.1531860828860; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:3962:4a1b:9e9e:eeb3? ([2001:67c:1232:144:3962:4a1b:9e9e:eeb3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14-v6sm1147399wmg.0.2018.07.17.13.53.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <1BBB5C21-8B1A-41A5-8C77-F8012733BBD2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_058C2F99-B1B2-43C5-8959-1ED77CA8F752"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 16:53:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <082365f7-3daa-1174-dc33-c4d31b76476d@ericsson.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
References: <ADEB7FCA-49C0-44D1-A60A-91BC3C61CBDD@bgp.nu> <082365f7-3daa-1174-dc33-c4d31b76476d@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/jGneZMrSrHgz7qTUfsH31qvtUVg>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Rfcplusplus BOF next steps?
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:54:03 -0000

Gonzalo,

> On Jul 17, 2018, at 3:43 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> during the BoF (and before the BoF on this list), we got good feedback
> and input from the community on a set of topics related to the RFC
> series. All that information will be useful for the RFC Editor, the
> RSOC, and the IAB to identify, if needed, more-concrete improvement
> areas in their respective areas of responsibility and potentially come
> up with action plans, which may involve further conversations with the
> community around certain issues.

I think it would be useful if the chairs would summarize the discussion and the sense of the room.

Thanks,
Bob


> 
> So, from our point of view as BoF chairs, the next step is for them to
> analyze the input from this BoF and take it from there. Defining
> more-concrete next steps is up to the RFC Editor, RSOC, and the IAB (as
> opposed to us BoF chairs).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> On 17/07/2018 9:01 AM, John G. Scudder wrote:
>> At the very end of the meeting I heard Gonzalo say “we have next steps” or similar. I was waiting for him to say what those next steps are, in specific, but instead he closed the meeting.
>> 
>> Whether I missed it, or whether they actually weren’t listed, Gonzalo, would you mind repeating what those next steps are?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> —John
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rfcplusplus mailing list
> Rfcplusplus@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus