IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] IRTF stream considerations

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 13 July 2018 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31EF130F12 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gIm9cPzzmDe for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2827130E75 for <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i12-v6so62603726oik.2 for <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dNSLnAwhhrJ/8TUt0YThjKLVxskXGgeTRoYkxhNkKvs=; b=SwJjsYepBSMsmXqHq+FhDbeLOplE7CResdja7jyeKulwFfpkdY0J9ValTZ5d7pe0qz w6Pw65PLGjbzBW/f8LTm929Fr9TOuAWUkfsOQrtFNr+Z4LoENEuEaclpq03SfbVlk7Zo 2on/dk3oHgSz/RdNanT0NWjppECgi3pTIkoXx7hYRxBzt8VjZXby/zxak/ikwRMMLbk8 5RDih/1gbbc18emcPPhQlykmr7/prZgdu0z6OWSOgc2EW/jMCg0qcgTe48SiIYGCiWxg 7L7jT0Ansu9AyoEF1MUYozcmzVUsVEiuWPFDCtpUmuoU8Ed/kEkhnLizV/qHRbU26tBg 9y0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dNSLnAwhhrJ/8TUt0YThjKLVxskXGgeTRoYkxhNkKvs=; b=UO+D9W3zGjO5/x6G4eWIv7jigYD5AkBHxcqJAHwoO9DTai2myhaehh8VKX+Bk9Jyhe 2kj0ddtYWX6kz5k3ww8tmhmFcmptGjjgaRJeFcPsaIkJLp3/JQ4encTr9uTG2k0WlMyo 4Q8X1SWmbSfeb9+hfWmd7laqbwDRy9CHydwCdlAKH9Kc+PvwVn8T4wJTQhqMZR8RVy7G GXk0kbfxbNbs+4MXYUY7ZqnZwxMEpgpipxl2GSlqq2obiEcgcD9hwzc0VyLg1ogw19Eg ceb+QsStESqhP55bIXHshO0a60PMcFnWeF7HhDrTMD8PH5xpR6Ep+ot7zhE3qJ/N+Y3o oRtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHnpNHFuA5Zw/clxHh/veR21sNjF6ErqeyHaZc1MSO4GbZTmr0l 9IhNvLmxUSnL1jC/JOnaCI8Rr1Giz5GRp5chrrE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdxKizpp+EdA1XAI5e0J6SQVzzy718HRNdDa0GtGTqWxV5xkx7NeZL5OA1yplY3KVvkjqKVdu6YKNVvim6ybK8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:e450:: with SMTP id b77-v6mr7796570oih.0.1531492493647; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:66d9:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <47e90834-aa80-3325-920e-8bcc12c604d2@gmail.com>
References: <CAP8yD=vm+jRxdi3ZUncoFZNDYKOQKvFaphT7gxb5o1tDXWmumA@mail.gmail.com> <b69b370c-317b-284f-85d1-1353c67a3043@gmail.com> <8f98deb9-7ed3-3303-356a-e6d3dc5a80c0@nostrum.com> <08e8650b-2f33-943e-ddcb-a6bf6c45b2ce@gmail.com> <c2c450a6-4f14-6325-8c54-6ecee4e0983f@nostrum.com> <22b91a2a-82ff-af78-4b79-c58eb305cec6@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCP+66+dxcukbG4BN24heH5oVHP6fJB0tZ3xA+Gsc2-QQ@mail.gmail.com> <0eefb84e-1a2b-4bbe-9e33-35a49b4db161@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAkxcPttoa6oXaE_HECvb-d1nqj+h1Ke3W3qXbtAqVNZA@mail.gmail.com> <97585f4a-1761-762c-83d7-15284364e46e@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAgfDS6nVeVHaqu-=_MdDeMzAvni4Pv0FUeMD9F-jomLg@mail.gmail.com> <47e90834-aa80-3325-920e-8bcc12c604d2@gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 07:34:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCB2_cAiz_Hj-fJ_8=fF+O+JTFxabOTeWKWgrWf+WJ5rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>, "Rfcplusplus@ietf.org" <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000f67300570e262bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/juDbTidbJrlmALUdMx3lYeLoAIc>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] IRTF stream considerations
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:35:09 -0000

Howdy,

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The proposed difference is in the label which is applied during
> > the experiment, nothing more.
>
> They would be denied the use of the abbreviation RFC and an RFC number
> in the series that was started in 1969, and presumably therefore
> of the ISSN number and a DOI in the same family.
>
> That is chucking out of the RFC series as far as I'm concerned. It
> couldn't be plainer.
>
> Regards
>    Brian
>

Well, language is a funny thing, and it may well evolve to where this
meaning is common.  Who knows?  It may even evolve to the point where the
barkeeps in Westerns have the bouncers experimentally relabel bad guys
through plate glass windows for comic effect.*

In the mean time, I must disagree with this characterization.  As an author
of a document recently adopted by one of the relevant streams, I don't
think relabeling the document would chuck me out of the conversation, and,
even if it has the effect of muting my voice, the aim of the experiment is
to rollback the status of any documents which experience that impact.

regards,

Ted

*At the time of writing the Urban Dictionary had no direct entry for
"chucking out", so there is the opportunity to enter "experimentally
relabel" there, if you care to.  At the worst, it would mean you could buy
a mug with your definition on it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email