[Rfcplusplus] RFC++@IETF 102 agenda posted

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Sat, 14 July 2018 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1951130FD1 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nyu5NjDHMQ11 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4983130FD6 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id y5-v6so29430962qti.12 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=mX1dU4GiuzYkN7iU+wgcUoyv+7Xhl72FkPCvDS7BMkM=; b=OdxiBoA6hOHG9yMUDHklul2/VZ4CJU9dtninYVkYba8ssYTB61h2bOr1z3Ja3ojTaM UNbqQ3l6X2Mu09z+M7Gl5Im5cLyLJW+QDMRipEJGiXN2z3Y56EDhsi9ri12PCb91GESx 1y/gVeY44zavLZlMN+VupFqYJj64JPFoWszKI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=mX1dU4GiuzYkN7iU+wgcUoyv+7Xhl72FkPCvDS7BMkM=; b=ob7DkS2/1vKcdAdp/7tW1nuhRQX04U0L98Aan5ky+T4OkQa6ymuep8ls/ttvxWrR4Y MM7NdzSoeQceL2OFPueez87TGWb2B/PevBhISKGvNFXI1Xs0XzhqqPR1AfaQxmeHcWq0 1LdAkJr2tyO2JqAWl+iTYDzrXnsZUQ91sPXscaWGj0vu0c6qFBpH2gQ/sk25CMId3qsl VIaab82p7qvL9v5mHIYj7QqAfR9Aojc3tuZ1N//drZgD9Xc2dIbdPFpMTzI+qgUPytlf 2lbDCHb3LxOzIT+zfSMl2woMRANrUTWLNbjaLIsZQVMsp6FIffJ1KyyAHnQezf/xphTz vpHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlENQr/X3liZp3xSdxpvGrNdd8HphC9OaDHLIHo7cSolBeJGYhtM lbavXw6KTHRBKt8n3ZXpWehaaS2OhLE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdur/bTG1zqm6aczOkREwK+vO6F+R1Cxv5jx96sYwvILpkgXL1YeTO61NLugWT1S5MJ4R6yQg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3209:: with SMTP id x9-v6mr9432968qta.128.1531575328725; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.225.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4-v6sm22320616qtm.79.2018.07.14.06.35.27 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Message-Id: <D79AED26-6388-4312-B1BA-68FDEA0E8196@sn3rd.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:35:26 -0400
To: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/mBG91gAbJgAOhicUy1UaNvEwzX0>
Subject: [Rfcplusplus] RFC++@IETF 102 agenda posted
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:35:32 -0000

All,

we have finally posted the agenda for the RFC++ BOF scheduled for Monday from 1810-1940 in the Laurier room.  Apologies for being tardy with the agenda, but the ongoing discussions have been helpful while pulling our thoughts together about how we would like to organize the BOF.  As you will notice, the chairs are doing most of the presenting prior to the discussion.  We felt this would yield the best results because both chairs are going to be neutral and not drive an agenda, i.e., we are just facilitating the discussion. Our plan is to do the typical administrativa, provide some background for those who might not be so steeped in IETF processes, and finally ask some questions that hopefully bound the discussion.  We are sure that we will not capture every subtle nuance the way every BOF participant would want it presented, but that is what the mic line is for.

We do however want to thank those who offered to present.

Cheers,

Gonzalo and Sean