Re: [Rfcplusplus] RFC++@IETF 102 agenda posted

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Sat, 14 July 2018 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202AB1310EF for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7hvnY5hGrre for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609C41310E8 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id h4-v6so29585646qtj.7 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=n3jLwXIchCh8cThFBjnJWX2BKPELB/IMn5mvV2hYqcY=; b=Ryl6q2LXnAOGATAex3awLiTL+VW1YuhFlY2OAdpCH+9IByWh5s+mZJQuNJ+QQmnqSM qVDTX+5OxXsF737h2JSbqGU9cZWPVL2vhf1qg4vwyb6ZXHLd6ktjfH9DjuCugLjq842M TKe7GX76k23t902w9Un0HOq4ZVIUjN3x0AgBs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=n3jLwXIchCh8cThFBjnJWX2BKPELB/IMn5mvV2hYqcY=; b=Lky5/IPU4/8XHsQNSdn6qHrcvq41ltZ7/8Vp04p9HuKjjOXfrAyQGw9gK0mmmY0d9S SnFuWFUcdL6wOEz9PopYCN3PzhPJDUO2jKYxEiRWOd7spr6j/BK9oEswNQnl+wz85O1S chvxQxJrUxibKuroGEHhtr6+QHsVSz14Is1GDaYcQliL8bbjACwBu9A1Icaw6dS31NRY 5PiQDNvKFGTfK2j6wm2L5tPw18AkUxc1TILdtqPhpGs5hjfffib9UKL9mB0XJRlbOpCD TMPkv1D+dKrDRpuO2zLYNQxZW1gCqzJaXFfuwj+ozC7IHRDggPgUvJJsgeeGDnadNNsF +yBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlESF/AilNR4SMPUfqloTw9kwmmj/vKuolCH+BHk1UwasIlhICRT ZsRzw9hehifBfq/4JNfbE2YM4DWqN5o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpe7WXQZmHcIFEV113cFD3j2PG6FJfLD9VO0mmmdmgVEN5jOn7eYgdpYTl9BJ7Fcgdf0+wyuHw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3885:: with SMTP id f5-v6mr9685572qtc.337.1531581850423; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.225.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1-v6sm5840908qta.19.2018.07.14.08.24.09 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:24:07 -0400
References: <D79AED26-6388-4312-B1BA-68FDEA0E8196@sn3rd.com>
To: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <D79AED26-6388-4312-B1BA-68FDEA0E8196@sn3rd.com>
Message-Id: <A43FC304-3523-4D65-B338-6CAEB941EC9A@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/sKgYY3f4-zuFQM2m-BHj0ehPhU0>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] RFC++@IETF 102 agenda posted
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:24:20 -0000

The agenda and material, when it is uploaded, will be available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rfcplusplus/meetings/

spt

> On Jul 14, 2018, at 09:35, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> we have finally posted the agenda for the RFC++ BOF scheduled for Monday from 1810-1940 in the Laurier room.  Apologies for being tardy with the agenda, but the ongoing discussions have been helpful while pulling our thoughts together about how we would like to organize the BOF.  As you will notice, the chairs are doing most of the presenting prior to the discussion.  We felt this would yield the best results because both chairs are going to be neutral and not drive an agenda, i.e., we are just facilitating the discussion. Our plan is to do the typical administrativa, provide some background for those who might not be so steeped in IETF processes, and finally ask some questions that hopefully bound the discussion.  We are sure that we will not capture every subtle nuance the way every BOF participant would want it presented, but that is what the mic line is for.
> 
> We do however want to thank those who offered to present.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo and Sean