IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Rfid] XML vs. Text vs. Binary

"Howard Kapustein" <hkapustein@manh.com> Fri, 22 July 2005 14:49 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dvyq8-0000sp-UN; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:49:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dvyq7-0000r8-77 for rfid@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:49:27 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA21553 for <rfid@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:49:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nat2.manh.com ([65.166.51.6] helo=manh.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DvzKL-0000Bi-U6 for rfid@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:20:43 -0400
Received: from ([10.100.101.63]) by relay3.manh.com with ESMTP id 4029073.7187114; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:48:18 -0400
Received: from ma-atl96.us.manh.com ([10.100.101.96]) by ma-atl63 with trend_isnt_name_B; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:48:17 -0400
Received: from ma-atl57.us.manh.com ([10.100.101.57]) by ma-atl96.us.manh.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:48:16 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Rfid] XML vs. Text vs. Binary
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:48:16 -0400
Message-ID: <02254DCB1D0B2340B8D1D54E770CAE76DAEC06@ma-atl57.us.manh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Rfid] XML vs. Text vs. Binary
Thread-Index: AcWOy/men23MQjeQQS+Yrpha2kNWXwAAFYlg
From: Howard Kapustein <hkapustein@manh.com>
To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.rfid@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2005 14:48:17.0027 (UTC) FILETIME=[6514ED30:01C58ECC]
X-esp: ESP<6>=RBL:<0> RDNS:<0> SHA:<4> UHA:<0> SLS:<0> BAYES:<2> SPF:<0> CAN-SPAM Compliance Dictionary (TRU7a):<0> NigeriaScam Dictionary (TRU7a):<0> Obscenities Dictionary (TRU7a):<0> Spam Dictionary (TRU7a):<0> Porn Dictionary (TRU7a):<0> Embed HTML Dictionary (TRU7a):<0> URL Dictionary (TRU7a):<0> HTML Dictionary (TRU7a):<0>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 01485d64dfa90b45a74269b3ca9d5574
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rfid@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rfid@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Control and Access of Infrastructure for RFID Operations Discussion List <rfid.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfid>, <mailto:rfid-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rfid>
List-Post: <mailto:rfid@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfid-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfid>, <mailto:rfid-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rfid-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: rfid-bounces@lists.ietf.org

>basic Perl, Python or Ruby

Which of these is not like the others? :->

_______________________________________________
Rfid mailing list
Rfid@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfid

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email