[rgchairs] AW: 63rd IETF Agenda - DRAFT

"Tschofenig, Hannes" <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com> Fri, 15 July 2005 10:51 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DtNmd-0003t0-DY; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:51:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DtNmb-0003mP-7V; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:51:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA23898; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:51:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gecko.sbs.de ([194.138.37.40]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtOFM-0003OD-4l; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:20:50 -0400
Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6FAojEP031069; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:50:45 +0200
Received: from fthw9xoa.ww002.siemens.net (fthw9xoa.ww002.siemens.net [157.163.133.201]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6FAofkd015659; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:50:44 +0200
Received: from MCHP7IEA.ww002.siemens.net ([139.25.131.146]) by fthw9xoa.ww002.siemens.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:50:39 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:49:47 +0200
Message-ID: <ECDC9C7BC7809340842C0E7FCF48C393421E23@MCHP7IEA.ww002.siemens.net>
Thread-Topic: 63rd IETF Agenda - DRAFT
Thread-Index: AcWJKQC5RbGv1OknSnS3tBlQV8nTsQAAdPLw
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes" <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com>
To: "Eric Burger" <eburger@brooktrout.com>, "Pete Resnick " <presnick@qualcomm.com>, "IETF Secretariat " <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2005 10:50:39.0801 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A38A290:01C5892B]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f60d0f7806b0c40781eee6b9cd0b2135
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, rgchairs@irtf.org, bofchairs@ietf.org
Subject: [rgchairs] AW: 63rd IETF Agenda - DRAFT
X-BeenThere: rgchairs@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF research group chairs list <rgchairs.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs>, <mailto:rgchairs-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:rgchairs@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rgchairs-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs>, <mailto:rgchairs-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rgchairs-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: rgchairs-bounces@lists.ietf.org

eric, you are certainly right. there is a large community in sip that is also interested in ecrit.

ciao
hannes


> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Eric Burger
> Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juli 2005 12:29
> An: 'Pete Resnick '; 'IETF Secretariat '
> Cc: 'Working Group Chairs '; 'rgchairs@irtf.org '; 
> 'bofchairs@ietf.org '
> Betreff: RE: 63rd IETF Agenda - DRAFT
> 
> 
> Afternoon would conflict with SIP.  Probably more overlap 
> with SIP than
> ECRIT.  SIP & ECRIT conflict with eachother. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org
> To: IETF Secretariat
> Cc: Working Group Chairs; rgchairs@irtf.org; bofchairs@ietf.org
> Sent: 7/15/05 12:06 AM
> Subject: Re: 63rd IETF Agenda - DRAFT
> 
> On 7/11/05 at 5:58 PM -0400, IETF Secretariat wrote:
> 
> >TUESDAY, August 2, 2005
> >1000-1030 Break (Beverages provided)
> >1030-1230 Morning Session II
> >APP	lemonade	Enhancements to Internet email to Support 
> >Diverse Service
> >Environments WG
> >INT	mipshop	MIPv6 Signaling and Handoff Optimization WG
> >INT	pwe3	Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge to Edge WG
> >OPS	bmwg	Benchmarking Methodology WG
> >RTG	pim	Protocol Independent Multicast WG
> >SEC	secmech	Security Mechanisms BOF
> >TSV	avt	Audio/Video Transport WG
> >TSV	ecrit	Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies
> WG
> 
> I suspect that LEMONADE and ECRIT are a conflict. However, later that
> day:
> 
> >1400-1600 Afternoon Session I
> >INT	eap	Extensible Authentication Protocol WG
> >INT	ipv6	Internet Protocol Version 6 WG
> >IRTF	dtnrg	Delay Tolerant Networking Research Group
> >SEC	pkix	Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) WG
> >TSV	nfsv4	Network File System Version 4 WG
> >TSV	sip	Session Initiation Protocol WG
> 
> I suspect that LEMONADE is not a conflict with any of these.
> 
> Just a suggestion.
> 
> pr
> -- 
> Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: 
> (858)651-1102
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Rgchairs mailing list
Rgchairs@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs