Re: [Rift] WGLC,IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
<wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn> Sun, 29 September 2019 05:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505BB12006A for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 22:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vajq0IhC_NDU for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 22:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260BB120048 for <rift@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 22:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 8ECAF9051BCA28D0CFF5 for <rift@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:58:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dgapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.35.13.16]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id x8T5viUu007771 for <rift@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:57:44 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (dgapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid1; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:57:43 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:57:43 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5d9047d781f598e3
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201909291357432071073@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAEz6PPSZQjrNNQhpkdFFoZYFBAq9FW59XLboXFRgT526S_bgww@mail.gmail.com>
References: DM5PR05MB35489E9A98D0A9508C9158CAD4B30@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com, CAEz6PPSZQjrNNQhpkdFFoZYFBAq9FW59XLboXFRgT526S_bgww@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn
To: rift@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn x8T5viUu007771
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/1mN4bPzPdQokZVtwB1YEZLErbd8>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC,IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:58:22 -0000
Support ++ Best regards, Corona Wei 原始邮件 发件人:XufengLiu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> 收件人:Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; 抄送人:Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>;rift-chairs@ietf.org <rift-chairs@ietf.org>;rift@ietf.org <rift@ietf.org>; 日 期 :2019年09月27日 22:29 主 题 :Re: [Rift] WGLC,IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08 _______________________________________________ RIFT mailing list RIFT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift Support. Thanks, - Xufeng On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:40 PM Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Hi RIFTers, This email starts WG Last Call, IPR and implementation polling for our base spec draft-ietf-rift-rift-08. It ends on 9/27. Please thoroughly review the document and voice your support/objection. If you’re a co-author/contributor, please explicitly respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. If you're not a co-author/contributor, you need to respond only if you are aware of any relevant IPR not yet disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Currently disclosed IPRs can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rift-rift. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thanks! Jeff and Jeffrey ------------------------------- From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 3:06 AM To: rift@ietf.org Subject: [Rift] LC version -08 LC ready version -08 has been posted Last few small changes based on input of people playing with both implementations in different scenarios * A new prefix tie type has been added PositiveExternalDisaggregationPrefixTIEType since it is necessary to distinguish between normal prefix and external prefix being disaggregated to preserve priorities in complex redistribution scenarios. BTW, negative prefixes are always least preferred and hence they don't need to differentiate. * Link pair carries now indication whether BFD is up 9on the link. This allows at the top of the fabric not only see links that are secured and outer keys but also whether link is BFD protected/BFD is up * NodeCapabilities are required now and minor protocol version is carried since there was no possiblity on adjacency building to check which minor verswion the peer speaks (major is carried in the envelope). Major version compatibility allows to aways decode the model but minor could be used in the future to understand minor schema variations thanks --- tony _______________________________________________ RIFT mailing list RIFT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
- [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for d… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Alankar Sharma
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… magno
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Melchior Aelmans
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… don.fedyk
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Bruno Rijsman
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Oliver Steudler
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Randy Bush
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Kazuki Shimizu
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Kazuki Shimizu
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… GangChen
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC,IPR and Implementation polling fo… zhang.zheng
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Rift] WGLC,IPR and Implementation polling fo… wei.yuehua
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Ilya Vershkov
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… John E Drake
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Dmitry Afanasiev
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang