[Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08

"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Fri, 13 September 2019 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67EA120111; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlfYk9ciYH4B; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA271200FA; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108159.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x8DJdP17015104; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:40:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=EPNGIkzHJSiBvDdWyFHa8Flc+vLFkdpjjZeRm8cWdBE=; b=xoisiOSSeVoG1ssc94vya1rIDLSRm8BFy6JeL5xSWvl7JE9JU+UzSjCHzbGwcWvqMh6Z 0CyZ+y/Z1tDkqjIO+9oLnv3nKmc7dt8dSfUjR5JtijphVBdx1g9vNmPtvN8xzYExUGDf 8GpCC+HD5ugeat3mgirQCHGK3m3L205wVOhoICoHAtBtTjdDrkgfbeI4090bwPVVGIWL ddpr0P4dIE4M4Jyw0s5Oth/l+iMSJvZS4ASuIlIyervIRtKVdlJARCqkXA1yvTIU+JKl oOpezsfu/TZiGvOyQTUddGE4YWc/6qAdTSc4v4Xn0J14e4mWSC1Er37HzFW+wXvYGsN8 AA==
Received: from nam01-bn3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01lp2056.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.56]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uytd8thqd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:40:16 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZqWG+txFqj1eeR5MSanOYTQRQYe+IR2NEdcOJswe/2NT+y7iCAOVW+cj6XClY8sfimLqxGRX38N7gyr9La/9+v44u+1Eb9cJw3I5bdoIp1bkhqPMMmrTkQVXwjnHIjueg23TR6PGa/e2Rvu8Y7Ulpkaol7DdnSFOISW+LHaB+by8DPC7sjBOMx73TbfLbvyOZMaOAi7WT5yGj3hiyDdCA31Qzifpun7GbwjHOr2kC8kToEuO6ZhBzjR9D22sNiAzMR4k87VGRxP8499yrLiPTy7KLZD+KS67/KJ2+kfPQqFrggZlJ3N9WHfzWFaeUp9ZhCMCypAY4DL3PDVxC4spEA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EPNGIkzHJSiBvDdWyFHa8Flc+vLFkdpjjZeRm8cWdBE=; b=cgQShIlQGFKtwbJmXyJ1I0VGDtyajESyscq35fmK4Qm9liie1tvmUw+ZEMy1+0mjThd/2ehEEq0rYl6o7/WM131gAhCUprqW7Op+MRNix/cwAWu2l4vTs/sd/W8KSSkZvGdj73zzlvFhieYRyNF6S4p49Wi+wtIJUpChuh3bZ6sSgIy787x+DHRGfcbq7yM5xotSSF3yAIbUl7lRLdimwVa+Hr8hTuWXvkanLanTd5dWVpA8LGzEmXrgGdSJJEjEXT1nUf/vFMUH5QEubMlbKEVxigSbmRZ0E7SjE8Mg4iOCVJsbka99uClZniDtzBlogEoLFsR7zo9pjb3CCXpMqQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
Received: from DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.242.153) by DM5PR05MB2857.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.168.175.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2263.9; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 19:40:13 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::210e:da87:a303:3e74]) by DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::210e:da87:a303:3e74%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2263.016; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 19:40:13 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>, "rift-chairs@ietf.org" <rift-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
Thread-Index: AdVqVcgVshB/jFDvRM+8c5HjmimYRw==
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 19:40:13 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR05MB35489E9A98D0A9508C9158CAD4B30@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.2.0.14
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [173.76.169.147]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 086fb10b-9e73-433f-12e2-08d738823275
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB2857;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB2857:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB285776CBB9E69E5493784D9AD4B30@DM5PR05MB2857.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0159AC2B97
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(256004)(6306002)(6436002)(9686003)(52536014)(66066001)(55016002)(74316002)(5660300002)(316002)(2501003)(305945005)(6506007)(53546011)(7736002)(26005)(8936002)(102836004)(81166006)(486006)(53936002)(81156014)(186003)(25786009)(476003)(8676002)(71200400001)(478600001)(7696005)(6116002)(71190400001)(33656002)(2906002)(86362001)(99286004)(14454004)(64756008)(66556008)(66946007)(66476007)(66446008)(2201001)(110136005)(76116006)(3846002)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB2857; H:DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 0apVMjXi8eu5sTK14Il7ypdFsKU2P6oOqCNsfj/G2ko9Xz5KRDlolY31TaXG/VvGRPcBN2MZa56IHqxYFHrSNIVWtjt9EupgOC18SCje2YEmQKlMzRcDO9aI8PsvWrlzOFELc7FWcF866+2Uijlo/3MEqUne2izLNDllr45NnC1KugouKUnjkl0ukGANAL3mYg/bH9rLQ04NAx8JXBFpL9vtj/Ld9Kgq9n4Um4IwCkOJ3cHhTtEFchiKO1OwSv7B+FywmSPDBiL0ebcTPcs2/0g7Xel32ba8KBbvS/atjnYEIXYk0VDT85KLTx3+2ahbpaxbXAEJ55GzOkeBCBqZI6e8nbUhNOSO6qJVp37OrAYDgq1nA8kXYWZvvFshujbSiuJy1cj1yTPrT8JSecllNM7tm1Usv0vGTsBqnBmGvOg=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 086fb10b-9e73-433f-12e2-08d738823275
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Sep 2019 19:40:13.8492 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 6uq9Y3V+QMHCUbpK3udaS2g0qx3+DPvTJFBrX21SqNLisq+cyFdzbFvHJDrt1iixEWwWfQEvzxReqXiR7NxI8w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB2857
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-13_09:2019-09-11,2019-09-13 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1909130201
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/414Wv5drv3T5QZf30s2S-stp32U>
Subject: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 19:40:20 -0000

Hi RIFTers,

This email starts WG Last Call, IPR and implementation polling  for our base spec draft-ietf-rift-rift-08. It ends on 9/27.

Please thoroughly review the document and voice your support/objection.

If you’re a co-author/contributor, please explicitly respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.

If you're not a co-author/contributor, you need to respond only if you are aware of any relevant IPR not yet disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Currently disclosed IPRs can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rift-riftrift.

We are also polling for any existing implementation.

Thanks!
Jeff and Jeffrey

-------------------------------

From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 3:06 AM
To: rift@ietf.org
Subject: [Rift] LC version -08

LC ready version -08 has been posted 

Last few small changes based on input of people playing with both implementations in different scenarios

* A new prefix tie type has been added PositiveExternalDisaggregationPrefixTIEType since it is necessary to distinguish between normal prefix and external prefix being disaggregated to preserve priorities in complex redistribution scenarios. BTW, negative prefixes are always least preferred and hence they don't need to differentiate. 
* Link pair carries now indication whether BFD is up 9on the link. This allows at the top of the fabric not only see links that are secured and outer keys but also whether link is BFD protected/BFD is up
* NodeCapabilities are required now and minor protocol version is carried since there was no possiblity on adjacency building to check which minor verswion the peer speaks (major is carried in the envelope). Major version compatibility allows to aways decode the model but minor could be used in the future to understand minor schema variations

thanks 

--- tony