Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
Dmitry Afanasiev <fl0w@yandex-team.ru> Tue, 08 October 2019 16:49 UTC
Return-Path: <fl0w@yandex-team.ru>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBFE12004C for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yandex-team.ru
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBzOaBU-kkps for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from forwardcorp1o.mail.yandex.net (forwardcorp1o.mail.yandex.net [95.108.205.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80065120018 for <rift@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxbackcorp2j.mail.yandex.net (mxbackcorp2j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::119]) by forwardcorp1o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D45B82E15C3 for <rift@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:49:47 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxbackcorp2j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Tm3lYhyQoU-nlNGJ2NY; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:49:47 +0300
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex-team.ru; s=default; t=1570553387; bh=RD3IbY7YC3rEr59jhuZXEaXGQGxgniFQdez2Dfqnwvw=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From:Message-Id; b=hR3z7PYhwJgXDTzns7lEqL7e/VX+SmecEYIXp/IPtv85OHnaymZH+Okq6s9hGyK6I fGW/v+poTFclwsxcH8CF3sFQQ4u34kmWFZTmhWyqZ8p5RnWAC/e10UOakq79FVRtGB t9QTFgw5Q33xAbXI+MQd4NzUxVisV5XF8x1hOR7k=
Authentication-Results: mxbackcorp2j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex-team.ru
X-Yandex-Sender-Uid: 1120000000014913
X-Yandex-Avir: 1
Received: from mxbackcorp2j.mail.yandex.net (localhost [::1]) by mxbackcorp2j.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id 9V2qJ0km16-fa79GSjW for <fl0w@yandex-team.ru>; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:49:12 +0300
Received: by sas1-fc7737ec834f.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:49:12 +0300
From: Dmitry Afanasiev <fl0w@yandex-team.ru>
To: rift@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR05MB354882299561BF4B6C64B1CDD49B0@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM5PR05MB35489E9A98D0A9508C9158CAD4B30@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DM5PR05MB354886C94DCE26C21BE97C4FD49F0@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DM5PR05MB354882299561BF4B6C64B1CDD49B0@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:49:47 +0300
Message-Id: <1784751570553352@sas1-fc7737ec834f.qloud-c.yandex.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/9DJVnivOwrPF_JfgoN8mtgplLoU>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:49:54 -0000
- [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for d… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Alankar Sharma
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… magno
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Melchior Aelmans
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… don.fedyk
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Bruno Rijsman
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Oliver Steudler
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Randy Bush
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Kazuki Shimizu
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Kazuki Shimizu
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… GangChen
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC,IPR and Implementation polling fo… zhang.zheng
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Rift] WGLC,IPR and Implementation polling fo… wei.yuehua
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Ilya Vershkov
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… John E Drake
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Dmitry Afanasiev
- Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling f… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang