Re: [Rift] Security review of draft-ietf-rift-rift-05 is now complete

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 May 2019 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0BE1201B8 for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2019 11:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqt_i5tSkvoG for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2019 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE41120162 for <rift@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 May 2019 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id a6so35947edv.1 for <rift@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 May 2019 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VllQQrhIG3fM5dgEoUFY8liZNqf1bjopbOVFGM8gbPA=; b=Q22yRjBBFQiyg+YPgNohvLIxIIgTTktL/AMGxgrk1vXVOaU3/WqbGv43zTyhrkteHS whJccEgLRjNqeGk8u/iPcDTvzZ8Et6qVKDIyFiHyD5FH/XWy6uQ22OCBfiQcCKC5Hbmn v077VCffIWvdqKw9P2TsOif5mNc23IG00tIX//VSl9Opovwey53waWldnHIK1k87+phB UzdSy5l///F9OjijzdfXK42QxVTTvD5NLJyYg2eWeQpYqm0jGqNG5mRNox4I3s+FZM7i Sxs204iLPnEK/vB3w8xEhov6pTY3i9ZaySJX1AtCFVdm449SSSj6rshLCW80Yo5cAxYw QDmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VllQQrhIG3fM5dgEoUFY8liZNqf1bjopbOVFGM8gbPA=; b=qgX/ZFOY6evS5Uv72MeuWy8XRIdxH13AEIdK7cnlbg98NJN1aMxbYLwTEHPaOdm1TM DCa89Bmcds3gakjHsNYdtL78tGOHe3ZeLqh+v+Kz9u8pOKMPa85pMPhi4uN+jybnHTsr 305DqTk3M8bG8pbSL6tbcNHTrVjzDzqBtnIw+c4Aq6fmQ4sjc0Hb16z4jQ46GLOPT61x +k+6xshPQNep4qnutwaZmv2nNS+ftBNgCm9PT3MUe3f5daza9uiF27vHf3EcAyhi+GPp MX1px9bSTpm527cPkITRqwQhNgkJUsrOtdkKrRgk1a1o6bsEiWUeAqfZOUc5bDouw6Ph cQhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfzZdpWr98yawr7TmYjr+8lpR+MJKG9acHMt6YjcsJhOZJwFfE BTBGNooKOCFR4RHRZP8fWiy5dTvH00pX7f26Ikw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxb2M7T76qtyO3LVrLIuX0AizlNZPmdumtn51GQMWPXV7vOIzjSRuPJ5PSOKz57yuKBWjfhmBMgQ3szoVq0c6w=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e01:: with SMTP id l1mr9189273eji.273.1556735372845; Wed, 01 May 2019 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0660FAD1-B80C-4D37-B4D6-6CE4F6759BCD@gmail.com> <7FAAD212-9335-4FD6-B064-0F7A25041177@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7FAAD212-9335-4FD6-B064-0F7A25041177@gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 11:28:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hM1j87vYvvUCjiURuOm8Uev4OKv+OJr9ueMW2otFxMBcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruno Rijsman <brunorijsman@gmail.com>
Cc: rift@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e86a0c0587d7b22e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/BKIXPZPwu8ztcmwUoKGoQMR2nEk>
Subject: Re: [Rift] Security review of draft-ietf-rift-rift-05 is now complete
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 18:29:44 -0000

uff, good amount of stuff, flipped through it, spec been updated this week
in bits (like the adjacency-doesn't-come-up-again-nonces-problem) so double
check but I'll go through your thing & comment later, good amount of it
probably deserves to go into spec into "security considerations" section

--- tony


On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:43 AM Bruno Rijsman <brunorijsman@gmail.com> wrote:

> My security review of draft-ietf-rift-rift-05 is now complete and
> available at http://bit.ly/rift-security-review
>
> — Bruno
>
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Bruno Rijsman <brunorijsman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> PS: Due to other activities, it will take me a week or two to finish the
> write-up of my comments on the security section of the RIFT draft. I want
> to make sure my write-up is accurate and complete before I send it out,
> because some of my comments are quite subtle or opinionated.
>
> — Bruno
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RIFT mailing list
> RIFT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
>