Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08

Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com> Fri, 13 September 2019 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5721200F9; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjJGHrhg-4yP; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA7FD12008C; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id m9so13829772pls.8; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=uFH612soNruz0pV6RQAjXbqRBS/0D4hVPkdpFIKEWtc=; b=A4WpYg951kswRoiXiAQO0mEVJnwbzAnwCrT4B2M0eA1U3MHMMadP3R0mlxlmJY6c29 k5KqTGZxB9MHcVytKoKUFHCNzsvTVSUCg5N54QexbUfj3diFR8AUgSuzZiJIv8zqm39F OcpghmBTzqj2qz6/SOKGjjEE9Vmov/5sS1PfBn5XamaCKRXg85zCXWI/WZRGcrxkSgfS juip+Wlg9I0ZORdUs4RSfN5m3X8ou8ctGQ476Q8jWkfk4evtI4aCxly8TuXqQTcZLdtC eGEOAMtrEWQqsWsNQ7SK31E0iWjtLMFKhGQ7aUX1OJjxMx089fIDFUbyS/axdnVnblyi xFIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=uFH612soNruz0pV6RQAjXbqRBS/0D4hVPkdpFIKEWtc=; b=tD5xVJqIeJy8o9uqcLirg3iCxFgzdi23SLtrw/ec9g59e00AUBzmafRE52MmeWaqPO wPTO+RpoTG5wwH7wjbgloUD958QCWO20x9ygcIdi5o4k+iAlTGyrKJ9dfFGIPBCyfC5O fNM0sc/tkQ3YZhSw/rOeNqoK95E/QSnZZDripJBfT9ATn1ws/aURSegYWvqtbzvaa2Zr yfW0rwKVGyU1EOYjHJst2dLOfYT4EBW6EYbJrzlzKAOfFJfZcCIomz1pqPtv6TpM63Dq GbR5H1Jf6JIVx1pMO0I7TwDTANyHG7Su8U8nDHcpFs4L0M7BsiEvAq93E7PnlLutlSde hdQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXfsCBhkgerB/+PxBJtlhGop76Zvxu2VPJbeEw8hyyl1vkWT4xi Dl9ztsUgKjRcOK9l/MCfJpDFBMwHZ20=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz+ipSCV7RuXKfMI+ASPUU9NmG7VJrPADaSFIccn/c2oCUmj/XqjWgmX09YsLYCtm/2akTlcw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b18e:: with SMTP id s14mr36199177plr.231.1568411393614; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kszarkowiczmbp2.jnpr.net ([66.129.239.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d190sm6845365pgc.25.2019.09.13.14.49.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <069593B9-FC1C-42A2-87EE-C231087E9F11@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E83389B1-4F5A-4534-A57C-9338A363E9C3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:49:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hO07bjsqNNueO8zbUECZQj3-iYPd+wkiF-KUW9Grp4nGA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "rift-chairs@ietf.org" <rift-chairs@ietf.org>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>
References: <DM5PR05MB35489E9A98D0A9508C9158CAD4B30@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CACh9UOT_FqSB=P0hObLFcPXOpABCCqmefn-RmS-7u-6Am0GyEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hO07bjsqNNueO8zbUECZQj3-iYPd+wkiF-KUW9Grp4nGA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/C271XcBLCJI8Ge6Dhs_1iViF4rQ>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 21:49:57 -0000

Support,

Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Thanks,
Krzysztof


> On 2019-Sep-13, at 22:21, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> +1 
> 
> not aware of any undisclosed IPR 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:06 PM Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com <mailto:as3957@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Support. 
> I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Alankar Sharma 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:40 PM Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> Hi RIFTers,
> 
> This email starts WG Last Call, IPR and implementation polling  for our base spec draft-ietf-rift-rift-08. It ends on 9/27.
> 
> Please thoroughly review the document and voice your support/objection.
> 
> If you’re a co-author/contributor, please explicitly respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
> 
> If you're not a co-author/contributor, you need to respond only if you are aware of any relevant IPR not yet disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Currently disclosed IPRs can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rift-rift <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rift-rift>;.
> 
> We are also polling for any existing implementation.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jeff and Jeffrey
> 
> -------------------------------
> 
> From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:rift-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 3:06 AM
> To: rift@ietf.org <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Rift] LC version -08
> 
> LC ready version -08 has been posted 
> 
> Last few small changes based on input of people playing with both implementations in different scenarios
> 
> * A new prefix tie type has been added PositiveExternalDisaggregationPrefixTIEType since it is necessary to distinguish between normal prefix and external prefix being disaggregated to preserve priorities in complex redistribution scenarios. BTW, negative prefixes are always least preferred and hence they don't need to differentiate. 
> * Link pair carries now indication whether BFD is up 9on the link. This allows at the top of the fabric not only see links that are secured and outer keys but also whether link is BFD protected/BFD is up
> * NodeCapabilities are required now and minor protocol version is carried since there was no possiblity on adjacency building to check which minor verswion the peer speaks (major is carried in the envelope). Major version compatibility allows to aways decode the model but minor could be used in the future to understand minor schema variations
> 
> thanks 
> 
> --- tony 
> _______________________________________________
> RIFT mailing list
> RIFT@ietf.org <mailto:RIFT@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>
> _______________________________________________
> RIFT mailing list
> RIFT@ietf.org <mailto:RIFT@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>
> _______________________________________________
> RIFT mailing list
> RIFT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift