Re: [Rift] IPv4 vs IPv6

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 18 July 2019 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF845120124 for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmxne7O4f1_y for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7607C1200E0 for <rift@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1hoDQ2-0003oR-Ul; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 20:54:27 +0000
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:54:26 -0700
Message-ID: <m2k1cf9i7x.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>, rift@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsznSPyS7zEKQNE2Ey8uZh-64P2MFE+fJt1054oaScyJtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907180636330.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA+wi2hP6K3Or7ynOUzKovxkx8ZtvnTUdKVDvjRcB8=4yjFD6aQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907182001590.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA+wi2hOkZH0O44yTikfabmDpJSqZN+_qmZnDBA1gsyFoVhzYuQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsznSPyS7zEKQNE2Ey8uZh-64P2MFE+fJt1054oaScyJtw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/KHUulqOcd7af_94vQlUm2GsceBI>
Subject: Re: [Rift] IPv4 vs IPv6
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 20:54:32 -0000

SHOULD support ipv4 and ipv6.  MUST support at least one.

randy