IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sat, 14 September 2019 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4111200C7; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 00:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=PmSiRCqu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=eBiu0e3n
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-GB-oxG6Cjq; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 00:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8934212000F; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 00:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15038; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1568445955; x=1569655555; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=JVU8XjvFxE266m016CKWwRnX1Sww4uWd96sXBFysFN8=; b=PmSiRCquvjDjOLC78R1Y/0WJwJ1qlbKD154hB67Ttr7/pOksSaLNmQ5B Jn+MZR6KyBWhp3OhTwUAP4+SklihP3YLkhUT+p7bCkcGA0Uf0E0lywCvv By+d0T0vU5Tm+E/ihDbPq3lJdmJUWTKc9beJ46IEWD0B61vt1zqDnwena A=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:uRDA8xK/JkBXx/UC+dmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeBvKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXFXnLOPgYjYmNM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CxAABvlXxd/4wNJK1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBZ4EWLyknA21WIAQLKoQhg0cDim+CXIlliTCEXIFCgRADVAkBAQEMAQEYAQwIAgEBhD8CF4JJIzgTAgMJAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FLgyFSgEBAQEDAQEQEQoTAQElBwsBDwIBCBEEAQEoAwICAh8GCxQJCAEBBAENBQgagwGBHU0DHQECDJ8SAoE4iGFzgTKCfQEBBYULDQuCFwMGgTSLeBiBQD+BEUaCHi4+ghpHAQECAReBFAESASErCYJVMoImjGuCY4UliR2OHUEKgiKHBYl7hBuCNYdHjx2OCYgMggiObgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSFncXAVO4JsgkKBJwEDgkeFFIU/cwENgRuNCIJFAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,504,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="628188844"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Sep 2019 07:25:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8E7PssA022152 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:25:54 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:25:53 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:25:53 -0500
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:53 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=e0B0R4ZnJJQVcDicxxTMXYrgkDvXwOC0DbwMStwgOj3yJQheOn2zKSadbzp4+kZSq0hhouUv1jF5wrHYmRh174ClW4rDfUaT4aE2KEwb0c5HTeS/u2uv4KgrghrUMtBYlwaUhcJZNC4HoLcGGstWmOIJzDIypcZSNQ+1PP30eLODfR3/Ubrg6ixj1AoshAOZ/tFrAUItb5AoWISlec/sZ79gUifH3pLnlnjOhnJKQcKxzzU27RzWUNinvbJXDgvbLuo0MGQHINNJA+2x75lOmeTR8XTWrGHYb7vbAaPEEDetPs0hb7CWIj8+3cTO9+kpv0HF5LbFmrmnzykbcJLBEw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JVU8XjvFxE266m016CKWwRnX1Sww4uWd96sXBFysFN8=; b=Y501yXkTICTeWnKoJeXwnyDNz/lRn3tAstzTiwsV4jGP1Ylp0+e/jJs/zuBCfMKfFBS+8Kh2tot8fEmz4FVDeoNbWLWrad0IPSnCB4JNey0b0buq+Mll95Rf4zmeUp6vFF3xNiPn2Afuqp89Lt6i/L7daSFPBzfs1rEmFRp+12x+FihiMyqcRRiqay/RFIYWiFKO5Yk9OdQHxdAMBQub0x6GutqwNy3QPVbU4ZM2vlvBgbJEU3Npyd37ff0hBUS0rOXc2Ypc2sE9yOeS/2f75uPj8yxM/XWkXdEBZhZcO1CYG7tZeDbyYurD/aIc8+cwN6q4TcyoH9O0ef1mOV1eow==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JVU8XjvFxE266m016CKWwRnX1Sww4uWd96sXBFysFN8=; b=eBiu0e3nWH3Wcp1r++Lpb8D3wBbelEAyXy2PcoSsFu8HDZSPdMsIrLP143224fRItujXoXXVd8qXeVzLCkF0zSSNg2OUTInSep1iUbG20Kf1NmtAZvVpu5dzGs+maLjSHcZ+STmmZ7uogOjezK1ESptsMVGTJQqu8CpVhMU6Xzc=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) by MN2PR11MB3696.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.253.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2263.21; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:25:51 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6986:12d5:b54f:f5ee]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6986:12d5:b54f:f5ee%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2263.016; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:25:51 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>, Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com>
CC: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rift-chairs@ietf.org" <rift-chairs@ietf.org>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
Thread-Index: AdVqVcgVshB/jFDvRM+8c5HjmimYRwAGPbgAAACBfYAAFyc94A==
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:25:41 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:25:17 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB3565054F13113A400A38EEE2D8B20@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM5PR05MB35489E9A98D0A9508C9158CAD4B30@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CACh9UOT_FqSB=P0hObLFcPXOpABCCqmefn-RmS-7u-6Am0GyEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hO07bjsqNNueO8zbUECZQj3-iYPd+wkiF-KUW9Grp4nGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hO07bjsqNNueO8zbUECZQj3-iYPd+wkiF-KUW9Grp4nGA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1003::4a]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0c76d882-b9ac-4f07-871a-08d738e4c5b3
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3696;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3696:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB36960D94F97F29CE00F37CBED8B20@MN2PR11MB3696.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 01604FB62B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(376002)(396003)(136003)(199004)(189003)(7696005)(86362001)(966005)(66946007)(76176011)(2906002)(53546011)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008)(4326008)(99286004)(5660300002)(14454004)(66446008)(52536014)(478600001)(6506007)(7736002)(33656002)(76116006)(6306002)(236005)(54896002)(790700001)(11346002)(9686003)(606006)(46003)(8936002)(71200400001)(6116002)(54906003)(25786009)(74316002)(316002)(476003)(6246003)(71190400001)(446003)(53936002)(8676002)(110136005)(6436002)(81156014)(81166006)(486006)(229853002)(6666004)(102836004)(186003)(256004)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3696; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: qGpgZxkXk5QB/B+jpIp8QFKiDcyNba3wbpEg4OGVL7cbwnIkLP8/6T2TPF9K09AxLLn4dkx2tjuYz6X8hi46H7fgXuXJDW4MSCFxkk4J0g4uQNzoF5g5YiyLtfV+nrRdfG1tPtWy08nxNpOzdYCDgZ0Ddj9BOAzY8pjYbTMX3Jc9k8r/6Rb4jk6EztyXHZ6LGsQmsT54Z1mEAwtjE87aWnQ4f1VZ1/H1dGCJqTX31OvcMixSBRSxARFgi4QSSmB2noBO9kRb/rdww2s+pjCoDh1iUdMY4W+V9E3hNfLbSto6Cr1A6Xc4A9MkTa6KJXIiA+W8YOyvuXJgzJAjhMi2adVHOB3kmtuKhH8EEY1A59kxKTDmtUJ6LvRoDMY/Pm5gMnJJ4PXwzFiy9QMxsC0Sw0r//QA7rPL8EfWmiTs9sFI=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB3565054F13113A400A38EEE2D8B20MN2PR11MB3565namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0c76d882-b9ac-4f07-871a-08d738e4c5b3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Sep 2019 07:25:51.5171 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: cx47pWGB/HyvxpgeqNlRRHTQ4c6cP9F7dh/iDQV+yl1tcxw/1kVY6AWmALZmcPSr2JIM1bMm5jodHesF2qkJkA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3696
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.23, xch-aln-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/PSXkPdnJX6hXYDonRv_RpK33DyM>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:25:58 -0000

+1

not aware of any undisclosed IPR

Pascal

From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda
Sent: vendredi 13 septembre 2019 22:21
To: Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; rift-chairs@ietf.org; rift@ietf.org; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08

+1

not aware of any undisclosed IPR

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:06 PM Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com<mailto:as3957@gmail.com>> wrote:
Support.
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Thanks,
Alankar Sharma

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:40 PM Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Hi RIFTers,

This email starts WG Last Call, IPR and implementation polling  for our base spec draft-ietf-rift-rift-08. It ends on 9/27.

Please thoroughly review the document and voice your support/objection.

If you’re a co-author/contributor, please explicitly respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.

If you're not a co-author/contributor, you need to respond only if you are aware of any relevant IPR not yet disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Currently disclosed IPRs can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rift-rift.

We are also polling for any existing implementation.

Thanks!
Jeff and Jeffrey

-------------------------------

From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rift-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 3:06 AM
To: rift@ietf.org<mailto:rift@ietf.org>
Subject: [Rift] LC version -08

LC ready version -08 has been posted

Last few small changes based on input of people playing with both implementations in different scenarios

* A new prefix tie type has been added PositiveExternalDisaggregationPrefixTIEType since it is necessary to distinguish between normal prefix and external prefix being disaggregated to preserve priorities in complex redistribution scenarios. BTW, negative prefixes are always least preferred and hence they don't need to differentiate.
* Link pair carries now indication whether BFD is up 9on the link. This allows at the top of the fabric not only see links that are secured and outer keys but also whether link is BFD protected/BFD is up
* NodeCapabilities are required now and minor protocol version is carried since there was no possiblity on adjacency building to check which minor verswion the peer speaks (major is carried in the envelope). Major version compatibility allows to aways decode the model but minor could be used in the future to understand minor schema variations

thanks

--- tony
_______________________________________________
RIFT mailing list
RIFT@ietf.org<mailto:RIFT@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
_______________________________________________
RIFT mailing list
RIFT@ietf.org<mailto:RIFT@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email