Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08

"don.fedyk" <don.fedyk@gmail.com> Sat, 14 September 2019 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <don.fedyk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A716912007A; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mORMW6sL-3Bs; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D74C0120059; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id r8so43029548iol.10; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:savedfromemail:date:subject:in-reply-to:importance:from :to:cc:mime-version; bh=3j1bN1aKIMQWaZ7tsfWRS9fw3Q2fWXFmGzf13hjBB/A=; b=AVpfrbhlXpH5E4shFu3PPiCSUcnDLqEiEb7Xli+NUxWzRal3C4+82CCWl4Kiuy9llj RMx7eP7TLUr6RvnGTpok4YV9Mdqrotk/J5HBEr6p6JRis8/dZ+FITjbKR32FOyzFQzjt vFWif/JNQzJsnTFJdM1gI3AgH9rqOIIMz4hG/xG4hDVJhO1BkWvBUf7GhihA5ZBXUHI/ xkgbJOkN9IXNs5x7YlSiEvRXYiyeCanGpnhv18aN8CdJ5ZSI1kXjcTAOk9neNYQOY60F MOM9Bu83t8/g9MK58lERZi8Ot9kocRDkPnDSKIk9V6scuM8RaNjDpxS1fq9ZtATrOLrR dk7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:savedfromemail:date:subject :in-reply-to:importance:from:to:cc:mime-version; bh=3j1bN1aKIMQWaZ7tsfWRS9fw3Q2fWXFmGzf13hjBB/A=; b=YSsKaSRGWpya3mbtjfU6+BQ6ysO3cRACVdwrhSxHrVRdUCUkNKyeyATKEXc/DCb0+u WBpKMmBVve7eU+esD5T9qXCvvhdYwaHCGEWp/wkDFt0L9ocaeEyRD3wZb0QzVJiWLYVy Sw5q2bJT6tL9zjbtFCNlA0BG0Kcenqma/p3M71mkgX5P1Yxf6/TRn0nNFaUaSadYBSXQ l31zDp+shoQdM6qdStWTBDyyqUrClrSSSjTXfATouEKZYU/4sDc7nGHAbqvHQCdDA1Ud 7uYLpDd9W7sR7ptnMaCdMlb4+9V3GnFXRfI3xISKr4zjdjljm/KqyK1nPO2r6bp3y7pH l9cA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWNXaSuFsBrcLTdDWuvVXI23ZLvucORdr3hbk9K5SmBWD/Tw3e0 83sxdbWD/67NJqO23XBcIQY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzloF6iRwJXMIeo6TUKi5y9yC33cTKnIbau9LPaf1cv7JlwFF9wIjMYdxZN8IKtrZKSBjo5GA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:3d4:: with SMTP id r20mr21388228jaq.104.1568452865937; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [100.89.207.2] ([208.54.80.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6sm21807502iom.34.2019.09.14.02.21.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5d7cb101.1c69fb81.f3a96.9385@mx.google.com>
SavedFromEmail: don.fedyk@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:21:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <okep0b4j7kdf6cgktaqt38i1.1568452713194@email.android.com>
Importance: normal
From: "don.fedyk" <don.fedyk@gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>, Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rift-chairs@ietf.org" <rift-chairs@ietf.org>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_1063181206881720"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/VZpdg9UwQqdDQA277VTUO79I724>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:21:11 -0000

+1Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.DonSent via mobile. 
-------- Original message --------From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Date: 9/14/19  8:26 AM  (GMT+00:00) To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>om>, Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>om>, rift-chairs@ietf.org, rift@ietf.org, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08 

 
+1 
 
not aware of any undisclosed IPR 
 
Pascal
 
From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org>
On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda
Sent: vendredi 13 septembre 2019 22:21
To: Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>om>; rift-chairs@ietf.org; rift@ietf.org; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
 


+1 


 


not aware of any undisclosed IPR 


 


On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:06 PM Alankar Sharma <as3957@gmail.com> wrote:




Support. 


I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. 



 


Thanks,


Alankar Sharma 


 


On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:40 PM Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:


Hi RIFTers,

This email starts WG Last Call, IPR and implementation polling  for our base spec draft-ietf-rift-rift-08. It ends on 9/27.

Please thoroughly review the document and voice your support/objection.

If you’re a co-author/contributor, please explicitly respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.

If you're not a co-author/contributor, you need to respond only if you are aware of any relevant IPR not yet disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Currently disclosed IPRs can be found here: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rift-riftrift.

We are also polling for any existing implementation.

Thanks!
Jeff and Jeffrey

-------------------------------

From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 3:06 AM
To: rift@ietf.org
Subject: [Rift] LC version -08

LC ready version -08 has been posted 

Last few small changes based on input of people playing with both implementations in different scenarios

* A new prefix tie type has been added PositiveExternalDisaggregationPrefixTIEType since it is necessary to distinguish between normal prefix and external prefix being disaggregated to preserve priorities in complex redistribution scenarios. BTW, negative prefixes
 are always least preferred and hence they don't need to differentiate. 
* Link pair carries now indication whether BFD is up 9on the link. This allows at the top of the fabric not only see links that are secured and outer keys but also whether link is BFD protected/BFD is up
* NodeCapabilities are required now and minor protocol version is carried since there was no possiblity on adjacency building to check which minor verswion the peer speaks (major is carried in the envelope). Major version compatibility allows to aways decode
 the model but minor could be used in the future to understand minor schema variations

thanks 

--- tony 
_______________________________________________
RIFT mailing list
RIFT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift



_______________________________________________
RIFT mailing list
RIFT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift