[Rift] today's dial in ...

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 April 2019 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9900512023C for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z9wdlY-N5SQa for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96BE5120203 for <rift@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id c1so242941edk.5 for <rift@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fmbiyzMcp8pvJ/R+wz1Bo/wMtnWFjskJz1vBFLtWmw0=; b=ISopEjnv0Ukc2185xYNx4fVUVUJPa6S4ztpI4eTo9HS2waCp8q22HQ+YrNYCg5pD0B lDf5JUZFrUGkLW2vc5nt7BbiES+DTe+vH/nIZXt5mGqlzhmcxahcddx7I2lYgnvu4eyQ Ma9AFzFIahZdFavFzKQ0OPaXdYOer4BQPrUNLCF0v8CYCDieZGuVgfy1p3VEezc4ELfA FhMJld5pc5grLjN1WCN4BcbFxn3/u8mBxVj7ByoAIZBzYIxNT+qnTKdTO5gtYkJa399K Ms+cWt1A0H/IrbpelQyWmp/riJf+T6meoIk2IMpDsgec6+w1r4Bzj334MeB0YYvjvfLT 9IUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fmbiyzMcp8pvJ/R+wz1Bo/wMtnWFjskJz1vBFLtWmw0=; b=lIkK9nr7ve2JAraySZ8GnWaNS6uY2dFcjalt9xCC2+xeJjW+FGP2kphBs0sBjFALGw hGVvgQCfXi5AIF9gRbnt/uSNlhASpGpqL78FkNNXBhuZoZFh5Ah3cxdgSaOJnuRWeFsv XvAk/Z9gtS6PZfe4IzP+Rz15v9B4+FJKOzo52uDeDqfqqLSrB6YTyTcpJGrwWGz0/glZ MEZTr0SkjXGmyp9GTq/TNvquYmflZzpWX1EWnXbx1Ifk4/EOJs7CcXgkvVSYBHsCVhdX uOYn5rgm6wC2P0BilB4oQql2uCX7oqcNP+sX+wS1W1suddPOjzhTBJdc0x3g7Ppbo0mt 7AIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUyZ3HlCNlB4CxMbix0CU8UrxkEiDXZUNZ5WBQPp9rVlBXT+jRw qszVBpXTPFj5EUNhroSVmxhaduXbCLAzhcPhM0CXj96l
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwNUR0+NyywikiboOfQhNQE58lI23M+7M+4uSYhTlqUuBkqOF0Fh3xfB6B/DfmFcCd/7AOf9ubGDR2wh8X/PJg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a03:: with SMTP id o3mr12330899ejr.6.1556205689079; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:20:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMTz6wtj3s9bKVUNK+Qe=r5F_hNAc8YNQ_E9H6z6Fumxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: rift@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004b8b2805875c5f82"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/w8ZC1vfO9LBqyzA6YibEEN_E8iM>
Subject: [Rift] today's dial in ...
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:21:55 -0000

nothing on agenda, just status report and missing items to go last call

* either security considerations document or we get AD sign-off to leave
all the security in main spec as it is
* applicability draft
* yang model

tasks assigned/being assigned by chairs

further:

* multicast no further progress
* Bruno expected to start a thread on experience with security implications
seen on implementation

thanks

-- tony