IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rift] WG Adoption call for draft-zzhang-rift-sr-04

Tom Hill <tom@ninjabadger.net> Sun, 05 June 2022 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@ninjabadger.net>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01111C15AAC8; Sat, 4 Jun 2022 19:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oe8wDUlJ-_bl; Sat, 4 Jun 2022 19:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authenticated.a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk (authenticated.a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk [90.155.4.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 369F7C14F728; Sat, 4 Jun 2022 19:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a02:8010:69a6:0:b97b:aae2:c753:292a] by painless-a.thn.aa.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <tom@ninjabadger.net>) id 1nxfqi-000h4o-Ig; Sun, 05 Jun 2022 03:18:39 +0100
Message-ID: <042417a1-ffb2-2a3a-7fdd-e98f53c803d5@ninjabadger.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 03:18:30 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-GB
To: rift@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR05MB5652AD5E3889B34DEFD683B7D4D89@BL0PR05MB5652.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Tom Hill <tom@ninjabadger.net>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB5652AD5E3889B34DEFD683B7D4D89@BL0PR05MB5652.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/yp8aCEuk0T9VEheat0Lr_jc_3rs>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WG Adoption call for draft-zzhang-rift-sr-04
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 02:18:50 -0000

On 27/05/2022 14:16, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote:
> This starts a two-week WG adoption call for draft-zzhang-rift-sr-04.

Has the draft been solicited anywhere prior to the adoption call? I 
can't see any emails, or an agenda item from #113.

Given the obvious overlap with spring, IMO it would at least be sensible 
to have it solicited with that WG before rift is tasked with adoption.

-- 
Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email