RE: [rip] Specific request processing
gmalkin@toplayer.com Thu, 18 March 2004 15:35 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA20307 for <rip-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:35:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zYi-0006Yj-00 for rip-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:35:48 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zXZ-0006NT-00 for rip-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:34:40 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zW7-000687-00; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:33:07 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3zW8-00066U-OG; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:33:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3zVT-00063d-4X for rip@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:32:27 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA19842 for <rip@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:32:16 -0500 (EST)
From: gmalkin@toplayer.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zVK-0005z1-00 for rip@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:32:18 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zTd-0005i1-00 for rip@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:30:35 -0500
Received: from mail.toplayer.com ([66.100.252.67] helo=tlnmail1.toplayer.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zS5-0005P6-00 for rip@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:28:57 -0500
Received: by tlnmail1.toplayer.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <G5XTTQSD>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:28:16 -0500
Message-ID: <F6242D340921D5118D1E00508BB9837A04BBB6B9@tlnmail1.toplayer.com>
To: kishoren@huawei.com, rip@ietf.org, ripng@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [rip] Specific request processing
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:28:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C40CFD.A0B1E9D0"
Sender: rip-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rip-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rip>, <mailto:rip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Information Protocol Working Group <rip.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rip>, <mailto:rip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_40_50, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60
You should respond with whichever route the router will use for that destination, whether or not it is a RIP route. This is true for all queries. Gary Malkin Cheap, fast, good... 508-870-1300 x254 Pick two! -----Original Message----- From: Nanda kishore [mailto:kishoren@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 5:06 AM To: rip@ietf.org; ripng@ietf.org Subject: [rip] Specific request processing Hi, In RIP, RIPng If we get a specific request for a particualr desination, RFC's say that we should respond without doing split-horizon processing. Does that mean that we should respond with only RIP route. Say there is a BGP/OSPF route for desination 210.1.1.0/24 and we got a specific request for that destination Case 1: There is a RIP route with cost 4 which is inactive (Administrative distance) Case 2: There is no RIP route to the destination (BGP/OSPF's route is there with cost XYZ) Which metric should we respond with. Regards Nanda kishore ----------------------- Senior Software Engineer Huawei Technology India Pvt. Ltd. Leela Galleria, Bangalore, India. Ph. 25265596 (R) 25217152 Ext 662 (O)
- [rip] Specific request processing Nanda kishore
- RE: [rip] Specific request processing gmalkin
- Re: [rip] Specific request processing Nanda kishore
- RE: [rip] Specific request processing gmalkin