Re: [rip] Specific request processing
Nanda kishore <kishoren@huawei.com> Thu, 18 March 2004 16:06 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21998 for <rip-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:06:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B402M-0000Ts-00 for rip-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:06:26 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B401S-0000RO-00 for rip-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:05:31 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B400y-0000Pp-00; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:05:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4010-00084o-Ef; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:05:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B400Y-00083Z-3v for rip@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:04:34 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21937 for <rip@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:04:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B400V-0000PP-00 for rip@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:04:31 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zzg-0000NY-00 for rip@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:03:41 -0500
Received: from mta0.huawei.com ([61.144.161.41] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3zzE-0000Hl-00 for rip@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:03:13 -0500
Received: from KISHORE (huawei.com [172.17.1.62]) by mta0.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.8 (built Jul 12 2002)) with ESMTPA id <0HUS0038S4IC0C@mta0.huawei.com> for rip@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:01:26 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:33:57 +0530
From: Nanda kishore <kishoren@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [rip] Specific request processing
To: gmalkin@toplayer.com, rip@ietf.org
Reply-to: Nanda kishore <kishoren@huawei.com>
Message-id: <000d01c40d02$9f5b6840$6604120a@KISHORE>
Organization: huawei
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_4pRDpjdd0hMbzLTmmRIPPQ)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <F6242D340921D5118D1E00508BB9837A04BBB6B9@tlnmail1.toplayer.com>
Sender: rip-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rip-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rip>, <mailto:rip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Information Protocol Working Group <rip.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rip>, <mailto:rip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_40_50, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60
But the metric will be inconsistent.
For ospf / BGP metric may be more than 16
How to respond send the metric in BGP say 123456
Wont' it be invalid in a rip response. ?.
Nanda kishore
-----------------------
Senior Software Engineer
Huawei Technology India Pvt. Ltd.
Leela Galleria,
Bangalore, India.
Ph. 25265596 (R)
25217152 Ext 662 (O)
----- Original Message -----
From: gmalkin@toplayer.com
To: kishoren@huawei.com ; rip@ietf.org ; ripng@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:58 PM
Subject: RE: [rip] Specific request processing
You should respond with whichever route the router will use for that destination,
whether or not it is a RIP route. This is true for all queries.
Gary Malkin Cheap, fast, good...
508-870-1300 x254 Pick two!
-----Original Message-----
From: Nanda kishore [mailto:kishoren@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 5:06 AM
To: rip@ietf.org; ripng@ietf.org
Subject: [rip] Specific request processing
Hi,
In RIP, RIPng If we get a specific request for a particualr desination, RFC's say
that we should respond without doing split-horizon processing. Does that mean that
we should respond with only RIP route.
Say there is a BGP/OSPF route for desination 210.1.1.0/24 and we got a specific request
for that destination
Case 1: There is a RIP route with cost 4 which is inactive (Administrative distance)
Case 2: There is no RIP route to the destination (BGP/OSPF's route is there with cost XYZ)
Which metric should we respond with.
Regards
Nanda kishore
-----------------------
Senior Software Engineer
Huawei Technology India Pvt. Ltd.
Leela Galleria,
Bangalore, India.
Ph. 25265596 (R)
25217152 Ext 662 (O)
- [rip] Specific request processing Nanda kishore
- RE: [rip] Specific request processing gmalkin
- Re: [rip] Specific request processing Nanda kishore
- RE: [rip] Specific request processing gmalkin