Re: Demand RIP

Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com> Thu, 02 December 1993 19:58 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11852; 2 Dec 93 14:58 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11848; 2 Dec 93 14:58 EST
Received: from atlas.xylogics.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16714; 2 Dec 93 14:58 EST
Received: by atlas.xylogics.com id AA11402 (5.65c/UK-2.1-930726); Thu, 2 Dec 1993 15:00:35 -0500
Received: from fennel.acc.com by atlas.xylogics.com with SMTP id AA07727 (5.65c/UK-2.1-930726); Thu, 2 Dec 1993 15:00:27 -0500
Received: from by fennel.acc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AB18219; Thu, 2 Dec 93 11:54:43 PST
Message-Id: <9312021954.AB18219@fennel.acc.com>
X-Sender: fbaker@fennel.acc.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1993 11:53:38 -0800
To: Gerry Meyer <gerry@spider.co.uk>, ietf-rip@xylogics.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Subject: Re: Demand RIP

I have one other issue you should note in your "restrictions": D-RIP
depends on the ability to place a call in either direction. DTR dialing
(common in the US) doesn't enjoy that characteristic.

=============================================================================
Don't blame ACC; they think I'm nuts too!