Re: Amsterdam BOF
stev knowles <stev@ftp.com> Mon, 19 April 1993 19:26 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24897;
19 Apr 93 15:26 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24893;
19 Apr 93 15:26 EDT
Received: from atlas.xylogics.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03809;
19 Apr 93 15:25 EDT
Received: by atlas.xylogics.com id AA09778 (5.65c/UK-2.1-930202);
Mon, 19 Apr 1993 15:26:20 -0400
Received: from ftp.com (babyoil.ftp.com) by atlas.xylogics.com with SMTP
id AA10737 (5.65c/UK-2.1-930202); Mon, 19 Apr 1993 15:26:10 -0400
Received: from stev.d-cell.ftp.com by ftp.com via PCMAIL with DMSP
id AA22099; Mon, 19 Apr 93 15:24:34 -0400
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 93 15:24:34 -0400
Message-Id: <9304191924.AA22099@ftp.com>
To: gmalkin@xylogics.com
Subject: Re: Amsterdam BOF
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: stev knowles <stev@ftp.com>
Cc: ietf-rip@xylogics.com, mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us
X-Orig-Sender: stev@ftp.com
Repository: babyoil.ftp.com
Originating-Client: d-cell.ftp.com
i woudl imagine that a regular WG session would be called, rather than a BOF, since the WG existed, and you are checking on the progress of its output.
- Amsterdam BOF Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Amsterdam BOF Marshall Rose (via RadioMail)
- Re: Amsterdam BOF stev knowles
- Amsterdam BOF Gary Scott Malkin
- Amsterdam BOF Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Amsterdam BOF Fred Baker
- Re: Amsterdam BOF Greg Vaudreuil