July IETF: RIP Version 2 WG (ripv2)

Gary Scott Malkin <gmalkin@xylogics.com> Fri, 02 July 1993 20:27 UTC

Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13474; 2 Jul 93 16:27 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23352; 2 Jul 93 16:27 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13423; 2 Jul 93 16:26 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13350; 2 Jul 93 16:22 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23151; 2 Jul 93 16:22 EDT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13345; 2 Jul 93 16:22 EDT
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Sender: ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Gary Scott Malkin <gmalkin@xylogics.com>
cc: ietf-rip@xylogics.com
Subject: July IETF: RIP Version 2 WG (ripv2)
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 93 16:22:21 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: mwalnut@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-ID: <9307021622.aa13345@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>



			       AGENDA

			RIP Version 2 WG (ripv2)
                             Routing Area

			 27th IETF - Amsterdam
		    Tuesday, 13 July 1993   1330-1530


1 - Review Charter
	The new charter tasks the working group with updating the
	RIP-2 RFCs and submitting them for consideration as Draft
	Standards.  New to the charter is the consideration of the
	Demand Routing document "draft-meyer-demandrouting-01.txt"

2 - Review RFC 1388 (protocol spec)
	The purpose of the review is to clarify any ambiguous text
	and determine if the resulting document should be submitted
	for consideration as a Draft Standard.

3 - Review RFC 1389 (MIB)
	The purpose of the review is to clarify any ambiguous text
	and determine if the resulting document should be submitted
	for consideration as a Draft Standard.

4 - Review RIP-2 implementation experience
	Have there been any problems with the specifications?  Has
	there been sufficient experience to recommend the RFCs for
	advancement in the standards track?

5 - Review the Demand Routing specification
	Is the specification compatible with the installed base?
	Is there any implementation experience?

6 - Summary of decisions and action items