RIP over circuit switched media

Oliver Korfmacher <okorf@netcs.com> Thu, 03 June 1993 18:52 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08550; 3 Jun 93 14:52 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08546; 3 Jun 93 14:52 EDT
Received: from atlas.xylogics.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18938; 3 Jun 93 14:52 EDT
Received: by atlas.xylogics.com id AA32285 (5.65c/UK-2.1-930202); Thu, 3 Jun 1993 14:51:49 -0400
Received: from thuer.netcs.com by atlas.xylogics.com with SMTP id AA26412 (5.65c/UK-2.1-930202); Thu, 3 Jun 1993 14:51:38 -0400
Received: from keks.netcs.com by thuer.netcs.com with SMTP (5.67a8+/25-eef) id AA00995; Thu, 3 Jun 1993 20:51:00 +0200
Received: by keks.netcs.com (5.65/25-eef) id AA05125; Thu, 3 Jun 93 20:50:44 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Oliver Korfmacher <okorf@netcs.com>
Message-Id: <9306031850.AA05125@keks.netcs.com>
Subject: RIP over circuit switched media
To: ietf-rip@xylogics.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 93 20:50:42 MEST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL0]
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

Can anybody comment the draft about RIP over curcuit switched media?
Is it considered too different compared to the RIP I, II as yet known?

From our point of view, we can see a strong need for support for
this kind of network infrastructure?!

Gruesse,

	Oliver

        Oliver Korfmacher (okorf@netcs.com, whois OK11)