Re: [rmcat] AD review of draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-09

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Tue, 06 February 2018 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA9C12E055; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:33:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CEseziN7do7O; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F3612E872; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx01.uio.no ([129.240.10.26]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1ej5FG-000GF3-DA; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:33:18 +0100
Received: from 93-58-133-64.ip158.fastwebnet.it ([93.58.133.64] helo=[10.0.0.4]) by mail-mx01.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1ej5FD-0003Xu-Au; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:33:17 +0100
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Message-Id: <1E9479C1-6B02-4D46-8B7C-8791BFD7E744@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2869A284-0579-405F-98C7-5F40BC8120E4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:33:12 +0100
In-Reply-To: <fcdafb8d-d3ff-5bd0-f502-9baea1dac615@kau.se>
Cc: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" <rmcat@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd.all@ietf.org
To: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
References: <227D2FC6-A331-4311-A8BF-E783B9F0B8EB@kuehlewind.net> <1b78e928-3fb3-7959-552a-e4c9bbcd7af6@kau.se> <1E245578-0EC9-4496-A683-9FBFBA1FC5C2@kuehlewind.net> <5E43ED74-2BBF-4E1E-8C4B-21D2D718E2F2@ifi.uio.no> <fcdafb8d-d3ff-5bd0-f502-9baea1dac615@kau.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx01.uio.no: 93.58.133.64 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=93.58.133.64; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[10.0.0.4];
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 0C55A1E8D08B6536BF94068D2F4039CF59631672
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/-SHPalXIs58R9cSmO32OT9QQLOg>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] AD review of draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-09
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:33:23 -0000

Hi,

(..)

> Either way, I do not think that coupled congestion control is a required read to understand the SBD document.
> 
> For the next update the authors may perhaps still consider removing the reference from the abstract, as it may in general look a bit odd.

ACK; I agree.


>>> There is no need to avoid lower case should. Actually there is the update of RFC2119 which clarifies this. You should probably also use the new boilerplate of RFC8174. Forgot to mention that!
> 
> Ok, good I had missed this. Authors, please add updating the boilerplate to the list for the next draft update.

and ACK.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Michael