[rmcat] Couple-cc draft returned to the RFC editor
Anna Brunström <anna.brunstrom@kau.se> Thu, 29 August 2019 08:36 UTC
Return-Path: <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E95120103 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kau.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EFBSPVya3r-w for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.kau.se (smtp1.kau.se [130.243.21.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1791B120020 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e-mailfilter02.sunet.se (e-mailfilter02.sunet.se [192.36.171.202]) by smtp1.kau.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA501850315 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:36:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exch-A3.personal.kau (exch-a3.kau.se [130.243.19.84]) by e-mailfilter02.sunet.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x7T8aWHE024822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:36:33 +0200
Received: from Exch-A2.personal.kau (130.243.19.83) by Exch-A3.personal.kau (130.243.19.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.1591.10; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:36:30 +0200
Received: from Exch-A2.personal.kau ([fe80::d09:7e68:ff95:4a60]) by Exch-A2.personal.kau ([fe80::d09:7e68:ff95:4a60%6]) with mapi id 15.01.1591.017; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:36:30 +0200
From: Anna Brunström <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
To: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Couple-cc draft returned to the RFC editor
Thread-Index: AdVeQ9dz9J+8DwOHSWiASbz3pAyUAA==
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:36:30 +0000
Message-ID: <0908f54e9d404d668d88a053049f5634@kau.se>
Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.243.27.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0908f54e9d404d668d88a053049f5634kause_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outbound, outbound-kau-se:default, kau-se:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-p0f-Info: os=Windows 7 or 8, link=Ethernet or modem
X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for fe80::d09:7e68:ff95:4a60
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-kau-se:outbound (inherits from outbound-kau-se:default, kau-se:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0a0SUAxd5 - bf0b74abf82d - 20190829
X-Antispam-Training-Forget: https://mailfilter.sunet.se/canit/b.php?c=f&i=0a0SUAxd5&m=bf0b74abf82d&rlm=outbound-kau-se&t=20190829
X-Antispam-Training-Nonspam: https://mailfilter.sunet.se/canit/b.php?c=n&i=0a0SUAxd5&m=bf0b74abf82d&rlm=outbound-kau-se&t=20190829
X-Antispam-Training-Phish: https://mailfilter.sunet.se/canit/b.php?c=p&i=0a0SUAxd5&m=bf0b74abf82d&rlm=outbound-kau-se&t=20190829
X-Antispam-Training-Spam: https://mailfilter.sunet.se/canit/b.php?c=s&i=0a0SUAxd5&m=bf0b74abf82d&rlm=outbound-kau-se&t=20190829
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: PfMRe/vJWMiXwM2YIH5BVExnUnw
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kau.se; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:content-type:mime-version; s=canit; bh= MMtNdrufZJ/pv5/61sL03PcxXIwY57Zbo2uLeJhcGnA=; b=g1Tigxb5wHPO5prV hKVIIvOjhW8Js6j7drNn+IGBkyaLBzH9D7uXD860JgLlCJ3GDUze5O3NpY21kzYX cNGvJ7IZDgEsm3DgRFaPTn2NzVCUKEGX6MrCm3qWfjJ6g7Yfo3P6q48MGBvS6fOF 6H8JRCcOJ1dexstLVrj5XDNE7IojmenofSimq75jKwyaa4KXn1PO7WCrjDT37FYz n5E4u0yTtLRNAGrhEy1Mo5az1m5Gew4sGBKBtFReq6A9UDe5xRD3LvSkOBuysMHQ 1J8ZSl6F55J+qMNXb6CEHgo/mWGjGvFr4+OOQsfVpwInmDSaxdb6cYi8cI4FMmXx LXw9cw==
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/1LgRN7U8vY8nemoU-z_lO8Z3vb8>
Subject: [rmcat] Couple-cc draft returned to the RFC editor
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:36:38 -0000
Dear all, As you have seen on the list last week, the authors submitted the updated version of the rmcat-coupled-cc draft that resolved the detected corner case with application limited flows. The updated draft has passed through or responsible AD (Mirja) and have now been returned to the RFC Editor. Thanks to the authors and to Julius for detecting and resolving the issue! Best Regards, Anna
- [rmcat] Couple-cc draft returned to the RFC editor Anna Brunström