IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-05.txt

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Sun, 26 March 2017 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EF112949A for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 11:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OT4q9iuMCiXj for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 11:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DBE4129497 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 11:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx06.uio.no ([129.240.10.40]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1csDKl-000Gx2-6Z for rmcat@ietf.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:56:11 +0200
Received: from swissotel07.s.subnet.rcn.com ([216.80.61.6] helo=[172.20.3.190]) by mail-mx06.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1csDKk-0000Jd-7d; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:56:11 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <B92EBFAE-A246-4E4A-8771-47D1951A73F1@csperkins.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:56:07 -0500
Cc: rmcat WG <rmcat@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BBB707A8-C9D2-4AB6-A57F-984D9CD50674@ifi.uio.no>
References: <148111854325.13729.9946710085994858033.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <66C087EE-823A-43C9-8E8B-A2364FD6511B@csperkins.org> <79DC47FB-2032-444C-9654-A0A87F93CC18@csperkins.org> <0A54D20B-45D0-41F6-AAAD-923A60F6C285@csperkins.org> <9DCBD472-DFFF-43CF-BBDC-6241BEA2C67A@ifi.uio.no> <111EB839-EC1B-4DCA-AC85-5AE63C21E812@csperkins.org> <5CD82FB1-C38E-475B-9C3A-C7C61EAEEE04@ifi.uio.no> <B92EBFAE-A246-4E4A-8771-47D1951A73F1@csperkins.org>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx06.uio.no: 216.80.61.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=216.80.61.6; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[172.20.3.190];
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 5 msgs/h 3 sum rcpts/h 7 sum msgs/h 4 total rcpts 53213 max rcpts/h 54 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.1, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=-0.118, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 1EAD528EAD709A40F943139101841AEE3911F4A8
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 216.80.61.6 spam_score: -50 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 4 total 31 max/h 7 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/3cHl-vCgzHDE4IawASxfwXkt50M>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:56:15 -0000

> On Mar 26, 2017, at 12:59 PM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 25 Mar 2017, at 05:53, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> This is actually there but too weakly qualified:
>> 
>> ***
>> a priority P(f), which here is assumed to be represented as a
>>     positive number within a fixed range.
>> ***
>> 
>> Suggest to change to:
>> 
>> ***
>> a priority P(f), which is a positive number within a fixed range.
>> ***
> 
> 
> I’d suggest “which is a positive number, greater than zero” to be clear zero is excluded. 

Ok with me.


> Also “within a fixed range” - what’s the range? It might be okay to remove this part.

Ok

Cheers,
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email