Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada

Safiqul Islam <safiquli@ifi.uio.no> Tue, 18 July 2017 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695CA131A6E for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4TixwcBZR9JG for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21D41317A1 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx06.uio.no ([129.240.10.40]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>) id 1dXOQv-0007kL-Nw; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:04:45 +0200
Received: from mail-ex03.exprod.uio.no ([129.240.52.6]) by mail-mx06.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>) id 1dXOQu-0000u1-9a; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:04:45 +0200
Received: from mail-ex04.exprod.uio.no (2001:700:100:52::7) by mail-ex03.exprod.uio.no (2001:700:100:52::6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:04:43 +0200
Received: from mail-ex04.exprod.uio.no ([fe80::5da2:f347:6a4b:effc]) by mail-ex04.exprod.uio.no ([fe80::5da2:f347:6a4b:effc%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1293.002; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:04:43 +0200
From: Safiqul Islam <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>
To: "rmcat@ietf.org WG" <rmcat@ietf.org>
CC: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada
Thread-Index: AQHS8Y2oGDx6cz1fHkmD8iuH+xsyuKJZRSYA
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:04:43 +0000
Message-ID: <69D72675-7213-4B68-A398-95E8668BE2EF@ifi.uio.no>
References: <7c5453a5-65f6-6f74-6214-346469c8abce@kau.se> <c8d9ec64-c332-fa8d-dd20-3dd307aabb97@kau.se>
In-Reply-To: <c8d9ec64-c332-fa8d-dd20-3dd307aabb97@kau.se>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [129.240.169.59]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_69D7267572134B68A39895E8668BE2EFifiuiono_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx06.uio.no: 129.240.52.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=129.240.52.6; envelope-from=safiquli@ifi.uio.no; helo=mail-ex03.exprod.uio.no;
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 2 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 2 sum msgs/h 1 total rcpts 2990 max rcpts/h 24 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.5, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=0.164, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: AE98D57E7C1ACD961B292D14BCF903965B12DA5A
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.52.6 spam_score: -14 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 23 total 2464057 max/h 2543 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
X-UiOonly: 8838FD1DE85BB8277A769B85A5507A8630A1CDAE
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/3ceWxCteWMbIVl6orFHJupWgqQc>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:04:50 -0000

Hi,

I have read through the draft. It is overall in a very good shape.

Regards,
/Safiqul


On 30 Jun 2017, at 12:42, Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se<mailto:anna.brunstrom@kau.se>> wrote:


Dear all,

The WGLC for NADA ended some time ago without any wg feedback. We still need a few reviews in order to progress the document. Note that even if you have no specific comments, but have read the document and find it ready for publication this is useful feedback.

Thanks for your help,
Anna

On 2017-04-05 11:30, Anna Brunstrom wrote:

This email announces a RMCAT Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on:

NADA: A Unified Congestion Control Scheme for Real-Time Media
draft-ietf-rmcat-nada<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-nada/>

Due to Easter, this WGLC will run for 3 weeks, ending at midnight US Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 25.  Comments should preferably be sent to the rmcat@ietf.org<mailto:rmcat@ietf.org> list, although purely editorial comments may be sent directly to the authors at draft-ietf-rmcat-nada.authors@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rmcat-nada.authors@ietf.org> - if doing so, please cc: the WG chairs at rmcat-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:rmcat-chairs@tools.ietf.org>.

We are looking for at least a couple of reviews during WGLC, so please help review the document.

Thanks,
Anna, Colin & Martin