[rmcat] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-12: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 March 2020 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EAC3A0BFA; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:41:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria@ietf.org, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, rmcat@ietf.org, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, varun.singh@iki.fi, csp@csperkins.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.119.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <158315648292.27434.4369140742681036338@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:41:22 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/58wf7O-jIWHzZFt-dZWir4D2aMQ>
Subject: [rmcat] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-rmcat-eval-criteria-12=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:41:23 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. It is indeed important to be
able to compare apples with apples.

I have a generic comment, is the case of multi-path / multi-home considered in
this document ?

Nevertheless, please find below some non-blocking COMMENTs (and I would
appreciate a response from the authors) and NITS.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Section 3 --
Please add references to PCAP format and expand the acronym.

-- Section 3.1 --
AFAIK, Unix timestamps have a 1-second accuracy but this document requires an
accurancy of 200 msec. Is it expected that Unix timestamp are enough ?

== NITS ==

-- Section 2 --
The sentence "The terminology defined ..." is not a sentence as there is no
verb :-)