Re: [rmcat] test cases for coupled cc [was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-02]

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Are your questions now clarified? If not, what exactly are the questions?

On 25.02.2016 09:31, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-02-24 12:01, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
>> Hi Zahed,
>>
>> quickly on this point:
>>
>> On 10.02.2016 10:24, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
>>>>> I believe we decided already at the last meeting that we need to
>>>>> adapt this draft to include uses cases for coupled congestion (and
>>>>> that’s why we asked Safiqul to propose some).
>>> That is what I can also recall but didn't see anything in the meeting
>>> minutes so was not sure what we agreed on. May be missed it in the
>>> meeting minutes.
>>
>> I guess there was no official decision of the wg to include text for
>> coupled-cc, however, Safiqul volunteered to provide some input here and
>> I don't recall that there have been any objections to include this. I
>> also don't see how this could be a problem.
> I didn't see this as a problem however I had some confusions and
> questions those needed to be clarified.
>
>>
>> I agree with you and Safiqul that we don't need to consider coupled-cc
>> for all test cases; only where it makes sense (e.g. test cases with one
>> flow do not make any sense...)
>>
>> If anybody has a different opinion, please speak up now!
>>
>> Mirja
>