[rmcat] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 04 September 2019 18:03 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2608120B46; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rmcat-nada@ietf.org, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, mls.ietf@gmail.com, rmcat@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156762019960.22821.4021704870686805554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 11:03:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/9HE8w8NiuYxxcPyC3P-a81nwP4E>
Subject: [rmcat] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:03:20 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-nada/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Section 4. Per “In the experimental phase of this draft …”, what experiment is being proposed and what is the exit criteria for it? Is this a reference to Section 8? If so, perhaps, drop the introductory clause: OLD: In the experimental phase of this draft, additional studies in real-world settings will gather further learnings on how to choose and adapt these parameter values in practical deployment. NEW: Additional studies in real-world settings suggested in Section 8 could gather further insight on how to choose and adapt these parameter values in practical deployment. (2) Editorial Nits: Section 1. Typo. s/descirbed/described/ Section 3. Typo. s/abrevity/brevity/ Section 3. Editorial. s/into compressed bitstream/ into a compressed bitstream/ Section 4. Typo. s/mutliplier/multiplier/ Section 4.1. Editorial? For the MULTILOSS variable, the default value is listed as “7.”, it seems like it should read 7 (no period), but maybe there is a missing decimal portion? Section 4.2. Typo. s/milliseonds/milliseconds/ Section 4.3. Typo. s/stablizes/stabilizes/ Section 4.3. Typo. s/absense/absence/ Section 5.1.3. Typo. s/straighforward/ straightforward/ Section 6.3. s/enviornments/environments/ Section 6.3. s/futher/further/ Section 7. Typo. s/descirbed/described/ Section 7. Typo. s/implemention/implementation/ Section 7. Typo. s/wirelss/wireless/ Section 8. Typo. s/adapte/adapt/ Section 8. Typo. s/preferrably/preferably/ Section 8. Typo. s/set up/setup/
- [rmcat] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-iet… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [rmcat] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)