[rmcat] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 March 2020 05:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510593A0C3F; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 21:10:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests@ietf.org, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, rmcat@ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, csp@csperkins.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.119.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <158338504130.29359.13757786280111258112@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 21:10:41 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/AysE1p30nmb8fRSpfwKQmeXN9JU>
Subject: [rmcat] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 05:10:42 -0000

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work that went into creating this document.

ID Nits correctly reports:

  == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements' is defined on line
     998, but no explicit reference was found in the text

As a note for the AD: I can’t find a justification in the ballot or shepherd’s
writeup for why this document has six authors instead of a smaller number of
editors and a list of contributors. It would be nice to capture the exception
rationale in one of those two places for posterity.