IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12

"Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com> Tue, 03 September 2019 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB19120118; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=ixx8vYG8; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=fjAc9ano
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JKl_s_xcpI47; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8CA12001A; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2276; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567519092; x=1568728692; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bJCn0ER4QxKpWIwcuceXG4A+mBv6U8H1lM88mPzeygQ=; b=ixx8vYG8jy2yEL9E3E1BLj8m4Fxq4EP4q2lFB7kK+6738ddaHT5+UMUC yZ++CqR5iKCdzlwVOntyYg9JvTC9mTU0Q4166qg39rRbhnuzoMAxCK6NB ksVJTdbdfi+1ZUqwT+cdxQCpn3Jah0K2tGokY7FxgD36Nx9nTO8sMkCuE g=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:idGc+xN+/eE7OPy9FUgl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu6w/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjrLfftdj46AexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BzAABIcG5d/4oNJK1lHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBVAYBAQsBgURQA4FDIAQLKoQhg0cDineaSIEugSQDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhD8CF4JfIzUIDgIDCAEBBAEBAQIBBgRthS4MhUsCAQMSEREMAQE3AQ8CAQgaAiYCAgIwFRACBAENBSKDAIFrAx0BnwgCgTiIYXOBMoJ8AQEFhQ8YghYJgQwoAYt3GIFAP4ERJx+CTD6ERIMLMoImjyycCmcKgh+QY4N4G5hmjXaYSQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUgE1gVhwFTsqAYJBgkKDcopTc4Epjl8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,463,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="318957616"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Sep 2019 13:58:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (xch-rcd-020.cisco.com [173.37.102.30]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x83DwBP3020406 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:58:11 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (173.37.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 08:58:07 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 08:58:07 -0500
Received: from NAM05-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 08:58:07 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fpFCQQJyKRt2UDKoVARLTkg8zbx3nDiCpLJ8ITYW9xJnyQPztH+vUg/FycsiJecGkgvz8Ldp7RpUaZWJ/YKtLw/b5WMG4XveVdxRBKdt7tWlLwZv1CWJ04QuKLPnH9LtSNuckyNkb4sqmfWVk6gBWlBpHVfCoEDWQNfVlezSKvhmUt1xtCgjDbHVGekXZzEXqpICsIM/25S53lOukne2t3TjtdoEVv9dDmgOFOZdu0tiw/qCE3pWXjALNfX/eCoMXa94hOPlWsg+0s1ONof8BV3+Dq2hDhSGzO3/CIlwMsStBphgF1klLdsTm8rVgv6tLKjIuIfL3Y5MinOym688ww==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bJCn0ER4QxKpWIwcuceXG4A+mBv6U8H1lM88mPzeygQ=; b=gBq4Pe2Bjcaa6PKIJa37A0Zg0CtOvO65b7WkJWZQqO6FQ/TJGWr/a6CyGbE2nt7bAsQ3tCu9T9ik6suQINtQEfpM7Egnh3cZiQmrOZldwkcdKtJLmfpHy9C/wgzEyR5FFIvmn8UQCA6cmD3RaEDzX3wW3HK2pcWtq74iDF7jsh/RQmXN/Sz8yrdRXdPRI0JkbTBKHyDIrfCuqBf0RaKO3EPydaHMP8L/fQIkR2rjRf2gbkyJRDipbKjhBq73XGVnXGisFhvepGMB43DTNmm6DCoMrqa8f4klS9rak/u6cqlIoe/NNi38dtxBIj3x1azFE83xjwRY4Iu1ZWvw7X74mw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bJCn0ER4QxKpWIwcuceXG4A+mBv6U8H1lM88mPzeygQ=; b=fjAc9anoUh48HQkC4fGCZOI1fpcf/5K/ySlFtXpq2kIso41dcrD5kOaibWlCaQs2QVw5wP/JjEN29HIQ8jE/1AunG4Yn/XC2GWn24Ll1MsQnoT5tFkFh6SBEXfy/c5UeIgmgXRscyQipVxf1uQGhGVzfubTPrwlgSkIEI3Pu67Y=
Received: from CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.72.140) by CY4PR11MB1560.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.66.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2199.19; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:58:06 +0000
Received: from CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::53:33f3:ea63:7f72]) by CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::53:33f3:ea63:7f72%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2199.021; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:58:06 +0000
From: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rmcat-nada.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rmcat-nada.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12
Thread-Index: AQHVX9RhTvB5ACBSt0aorlE+TR0wk6cZq7yA
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:58:05 +0000
Message-ID: <BE9766EC-DC89-44E8-BCAA-69B1A900D51A@cisco.com>
References: <156723937469.15325.11710425059607223952@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156723937469.15325.11710425059607223952@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=xiaoqzhu@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:1402:1250:3d62:80e8:fc02:e64c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c9e2fa91-43de-4829-64f4-08d73076bece
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CY4PR11MB1560;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR11MB1560:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR11MB1560BF69C0150D98681B67C7C9B90@CY4PR11MB1560.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 01494FA7F7
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(14454004)(2906002)(186003)(8676002)(102836004)(6486002)(486006)(76176011)(5660300002)(6116002)(229853002)(7736002)(478600001)(25786009)(6436002)(11346002)(91956017)(8936002)(76116006)(71190400001)(71200400001)(58126008)(316002)(99286004)(66476007)(36756003)(66556008)(64756008)(305945005)(66446008)(4326008)(53936002)(54906003)(2501003)(476003)(33656002)(446003)(2616005)(6246003)(6506007)(6512007)(81166006)(81156014)(86362001)(256004)(46003)(66946007)(110136005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR11MB1560; H:CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: dU3T/eLw3M0zupGLNfopbsIIKwPCbLd3o79NzGgepjHUaBPPSuoFvdxa8r5Qba0CUIYXwei4/AN+DRc5VjyiWOHtylacZVkR/xr3xY2pHZ85EFBLNPTCWROPV6cSrz8O8gjvqkOsY2AHp4RGakcDk/tiK7P2zsftZA60SpFr1uO7hL4OusoxtdlNCGvWUlTeFDUKc0BnfaIp49Bq/SiHo58gFJUyg8hedDrwVpelaqdYl8SE77RW3uRNa9AXPMySst1nX/rxrnn+cAqDafUxYethV5OypjM08ityiASYCystZcvzmMYbUJs5zG7PZWxo6r8xGAmOXJ8+Pwlw62kNDaJmvME7R1srMVrCuE+5dmECFL6QzHfi+8w/7CYxaCRxpW/y996+If90kgJNkRiG3iV6KRlsXFqEmW+ZFyAoNTM=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4EE787317D5E2D4E8D84336A4FFBD548@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c9e2fa91-43de-4829-64f4-08d73076bece
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Sep 2019 13:58:05.9077 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yeDHtMNh9CiheijcPAjNxUBQGXymgDpPNRe5kxQ9ARjgrUgK5P4p341ZEEOI33ZRNI4xpzh/QMHHI/3Erm61sQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR11MB1560
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.30, xch-rcd-020.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/CGiHtqdfg-XidOTqgINSEmU97-4>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:58:15 -0000

Thanks a lot for your review and for catching the glitch in the reference list.  Will fix that in the next revision. 

Best,
Xiaoqing
 

On 8/31/19, 3:16 AM, "Sheng Jiang via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
    Review result: Has Nits
    
    I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
    effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
    were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF
    drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD
    reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
    these comments just like any other last call comments.
    
    This experimental document describes an experimental congestion control scheme 
    called network-assisted dynamic adaptation (NADA). The sender regulates its
    sending rate based on either implicit or explicit congestion signaling. The
    document has only described the mechanism and algorithms. This does NOT define
    any massage format, massage exchanging procedure, etc. therefore, it is NOT a
    traditional standard document which is mainly for inter-operation purpose.
    Based on the assumption that such document was also suitable to be published as
    a RFC, I think this document is clear and well-written.
    
    There are a small Nit: draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model (published as RFC
    8593) has been defined as a reference, but not been quoted in the main text.
    
    Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
    Review result: Has NITs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email