[rmcat] Proposal for revised RMCAT milestones

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Fri, 24 March 2017 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C43C1293DB for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXz7QoO1lCdT for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D469B1292D0 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=33964 helo=[192.168.0.71]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1crYWH-0003PE-Op for rmcat@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:21:22 +0000
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FF5AA5CE-3E2C-42A4-BE43-DB10938A98B4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Message-Id: <ED3C49AA-510F-4BE3-B780-AA66D763627E@csperkins.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:21:18 +0000
To: "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" <rmcat@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28
X-Mythic-Debug: State = no_sa; Score =
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/FQbuMJtvE4CjEC9x-KaJGvp_Wto>
Subject: [rmcat] Proposal for revised RMCAT milestones
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:21:27 -0000

WG,

The working group’s milestones are outdated, with several of them being in the past. After reviewing the state of the work, the chairs propose to revise the group’s milestones as follows:

Submit congestion control to IESG for Proposed Standard (Oct 2016 → Nov 2018)
Submit techniques to detect, instrument or diagnose failing to meet RT schedules to IESG as Informational (Jun 2016 → Jul 2018)
Publish first draft of techniques to detect, instrument or diagnose failing to meet RT schedules (Feb 2016 → Mar 2018)
Publish first draft of Standards Track congestion control algorithm (Feb 2016 → Mar 2018)
Publish first draft of evaluation results (Feb 2016 -> Mar 2018)
Submit requirements and evaluation criteria to IESG as Informational  (Dec 2015 → Aug 2017) – this is draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements and draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria
Submit RTCP extension requirements for use with congestion control algorithms to AVTCORE (if needed) (Dec 2015 → Aug 2017) – this is the design team output
Submit interactions between applications and RTP flows to IESG as Informational (Dec 2015 → Mar 2018)
Submit first congestion control candidate to IESG for Experimental publication (Dec 2015 → Apr 2017) – this is SCReAM, shortly followed by NADA
Submit identifying and controlling groups of flows to IESG for Experimental publication (Dec 2015 → Apr 2017) – this is draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc and draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd

Before we do this, we’d appreciate comments from the working group on this proposal, and whether the suggested milestones seem reasonable.

Thanks,
Colin (for the WG co-chairs)



-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/