IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] Wireless test cases

"Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com> Fri, 19 February 2016 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD401ACCFF for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:27:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXyYU5RZAmqE for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:27:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 074CB1ACCE3 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:27:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1470; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1455913641; x=1457123241; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yZRT/YGnipc7yq8eeLu5ORf0E+OHcLMvN8IxjqDF8nc=; b=DeJuwr+cyNHM5Ye7dlTDPXdU3rhOeLCfIm3vcyYy52uQYkVYZozsR3M2 7jaQ/VRy/pqhWJ53lfxH8dJH3EY2xoxtdyvrkYODJfLgD7ZSQb1Er3DIf +UPqbC+CPNizJ/fcq3HuW6kimJDNMUehFVXN8r3lUknb/XcANMse5Oy8J E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DwBwBresdW/5hdJa1egzpSbQaFfqVXAQQBjmQBDYFoIYVsAoFXOBQBAQEBAQEBZCeEQQEBAQICeRACAQgRBAEBCiUPIx0IAgQBDQUJiBEOvAQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVhhKEO4QzhDwFjWKJJQGNXYxDgjCORwEeAQFCggMZgUhqAYc+fQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,472,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="240381456"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Feb 2016 20:27:12 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (xch-aln-019.cisco.com [173.36.7.29]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u1JKRBZ3002887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:27:12 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:27:11 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:27:11 -0600
From: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" <rmcat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Wireless test cases
Thread-Index: AQHRaNy/VapPwARipkaYL6fylYsp7Z8z0rMz
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:27:11 +0000
Message-ID: <1455913631142.29407@cisco.com>
References: <6902D83B-55B3-4D22-8B37-A71A89720DDF@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <6902D83B-55B3-4D22-8B37-A71A89720DDF@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.152.13.83]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/HDiqHMRjWWW9jcUQqo3u5Z0juTs>
Cc: Anna Brunström <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Wireless test cases
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:27:22 -0000

Hi Mirja, 

For evaluation of NADA, we have previously run NS-3-based simulation test on the Wi-Fi test cases as described in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the draft.  

So far we've only tested with a fixed number of RMCAT flows only. The test scenarios with TCP background flows yet and varying number of flows are in the pipeline.   Results were presented earlier at IETF-93:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-rmcat-1.pdf

As for Sec. 3 on Cellular Network Specific Test Cases, would appreciate more detailed information on how to set those up, or relevant pointers/code on cellular network simulators.  

Thanks,
Xiaoqing
________________________________________
From: rmcat <rmcat-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 11:08 AM
To: rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)
Cc: Anna Brunström
Subject: [rmcat] Wireless test cases

Hi all,

quick questions on the wireless test cases:

First, who did already run all or some of the test cases, and which?

And, second, should all the wireless test cases (both mobile and wifi) be part of the set of 'base' test cases for which we as a group would like to see results before moving a candidate document forward or do we need to even pick a subset of those?

Mirja

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status