Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-04.txt

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Mon, 31 October 2016 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4703B129593 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2g5U_O-I57ZC for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out01.uio.no (mail-out01.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED89D12943C for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44]) by mail-out01.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1c18kR-00074q-LC for rmcat@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:19:19 +0100
Received: from boomerang.ifi.uio.no ([129.240.68.135]) by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1c18kR-0003Zg-6p for rmcat@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:19:19 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <147790539056.32501.10691854906681967775.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:19:18 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <975AF5E4-BCA5-46AA-A0F7-184BA7AAD526@ifi.uio.no>
References: <147790539056.32501.10691854906681967775.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: rmcat WG <rmcat@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 1 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 3 sum msgs/h 3 total rcpts 48088 max rcpts/h 54 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.1, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.055, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: AC6EC5383F96FE2CA0F8BA30A950D9DEB236BE1A
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.68.135 spam_score: -60 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 11491 max/h 21 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/LQg9iQZjC_NGR5QEiYnM5nZpYUQ>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-04.txt
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:19:24 -0000

Hi all,

This update incorporates all the comments from WGLC (which all were editorial).

Cheers,
Michael et al


> On 31 Oct 2016, at 10:16, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Coupled congestion control for RTP media
>        Authors         : Safiqul Islam
>                          Michael Welzl
>                          Stein Gjessing
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 24
> 	Date            : 2016-10-31
> 
> Abstract:
>   When multiple congestion controlled RTP sessions traverse the same
>   network bottleneck, combining their controls can improve the total
>   on-the-wire behavior in terms of delay, loss and fairness.  This
>   document describes such a method for flows that have the same sender,
>   in a way that is as flexible and simple as possible while minimizing
>   the amount of changes needed to existing RTP applications.  It
>   specifies how to apply the method for both the NADA and Google
>   congestion control algorithms.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-04
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>