Re: [rmcat] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-12: (with COMMENT)

Joerg Ott <jo@netlab.tkk.fi> Thu, 19 March 2020 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jo@netlab.tkk.fi>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081AC3A046D; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMOTim4p6O9O; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out-01.aalto.fi (smtp-out-01.aalto.fi [130.233.228.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795283A045E; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out-01.aalto.fi (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 20736115911_E738D08B; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:17:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.177]) by smtp-out-01.aalto.fi (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTP id EC4CF11590F_E738D07F; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:17:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64001E13A; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:17:27 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at luuri.netlab.hut.fi
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FXaTRSN6IfUf; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:17:22 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ip5f5bede2.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.91.237.226]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA7F91E138; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:17:21 +0200 (EET)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, varun.singh@iki.fi, draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria@ietf.org, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, rmcat@ietf.org, csp@csperkins.org
References: <158315648292.27434.4369140742681036338@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Joerg Ott <jo@netlab.tkk.fi>
Message-ID: <5254b5a6-a2f5-5cca-325a-2009e8af0508@netlab.tkk.fi>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:17:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158315648292.27434.4369140742681036338@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SASI-RCODE: 200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/PiCwUMBpKYX8rhtTm8XYikhe10o>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-rmcat-eval-criteria-12=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:17:34 -0000

Hi Érik,

thanks much for the review.

> Thank you for the work put into this document. It is indeed important to be
> able to compare apples with apples.
> 
> I have a generic comment, is the case of multi-path / multi-home considered in
> this document ?

No, this is out of scope.

> Nevertheless, please find below some non-blocking COMMENTs (and I would
> appreciate a response from the authors) and NITS.
> 
> I hope that this helps to improve the document,
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -éric
> 
> == COMMENTS ==
> 
> -- Section 3 --
> Please add references to PCAP format and expand the acronym.

Done in -13

> -- Section 3.1 --
> AFAIK, Unix timestamps have a 1-second accuracy but this document requires an
> accurancy of 200 msec. Is it expected that Unix timestamp are enough ?

gettimeday() gives (s, us) pairs or (s, ns) that would be transformed
into s.us or s.ns representation -- but happy to spec this explicitly.
We are looking into a few other clarifications that will go into the -14
update.

> == NITS ==
> 
> -- Section 2 --
> The sentence "The terminology defined ..." is not a sentence as there is no
> verb :-)

Oh well, must have gotten distracted.  Fixed in -13 already.

Best,
Jörg