Re: [rmcat] How to handle remaining milestones

Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB4D120C0A for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygggNcqzWLTY for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr10070.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.1.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E851E120C2B for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:39:39 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XXgoevbFMoc60VlEhHBljoL7Bpxko0iAZwfNDSJGWumBjvGO0lMu2SB0qFT3KOG/tb6QlHflgC50XOrKCAryq3dQwcwZTIoMqijVKO9+oSEx4M1jlIS1at2OognWcYcnN2g0XhmZY9GfuSR+cQfDB3vsCOMOLYsOTx05DSnCKW0AORcxoTD5GeDtYjWXYbFd2+FrePjXkKQbdZSWQAEjoFs24LlmoA6soHCeqRhZBCi4XP7J+cYptp0tlsPBRG7Fs8Z4r95K0uPyC5QPs2DEewvDjYByh3ttrlGy4YHPAJB7ZuV+B/ylrcN6As6saXfs9b1StUUm+iim/c6mpG3oZA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uRavb5qJizk8/z5pCkcXV2mG+CrYWKM1IwigydlVX/4=; b=ImgWoMViWkFVnWP0n067ZUkgHvV9fl+CUQrwmL2HUxeuNO3twZttsx6zmUbbk6zeGmCk4EBCZHLIkKA5JXzr2TlxH1CY11cnH+5irVMjQFZbKttyBGFC/V1CnbgjnHBeCAexLYmkUemsukB3Vy0+IT2tfziET040bi4Q7py2BqYrpVqYxrNyZOhF0EBPa9FdKXbaKUP9KQgZhP9vciAjDa2CXhoTXVVAJkk5qGa3OCyMYuqF6FgZtTIHw+E3F3wBqRqwi9oMH06D2c2A0lXiu+uKCw7In3VguliHZ1Cx+3H1Vpn2R4p9IsDMoTuXDZg/U27Os4J0NT+wWeA7K+JDhA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uRavb5qJizk8/z5pCkcXV2mG+CrYWKM1IwigydlVX/4=; b=WDH2xW7VWKAuqFikZuc1hbD9+WPMIcamWDyqGoHCom6zaVyYUiUGiujty3xpFFyy1Iz8ISrCXY3aeBDKTByNLVFXvNM9GvKtIHQbszsfCV2PqBcfd380TQZFpZ9wJuJYf9X7xajBz3DuEhYD6Af+9m9x+od/9eD9Nx/0YVTlWik=
Received: from HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.176.162.29) by HE1PR07MB3178.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.245.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2474.7; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:39:37 +0000
Received: from HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dc3f:bc2e:d106:e087]) by HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dc3f:bc2e:d106:e087%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2474.015; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:39:37 +0000
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>, "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>
CC: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] How to handle remaining milestones
Thread-Index: AQHVnkr/jLoB6Fw5VEym1mk+J7Ss/6eSTIXQ
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:39:36 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB4425D9B9C9E14278E687748FC24C0@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <cde7bae8743b4637b0cc0ae6fba3cd35@kau.se>
In-Reply-To: <cde7bae8743b4637b0cc0ae6fba3cd35@kau.se>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.82]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 68010845-980a-4820-7b4f-08d76cdcc645
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB3178:|HE1PR07MB3178:|HE1PR07MB3178:
x-ld-processed: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f,ExtAddr
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB31781023869BF180B8015190C24C0@HE1PR07MB3178.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 022649CC2C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(346002)(366004)(396003)(199004)(189003)(9326002)(236005)(66476007)(6306002)(66556008)(64756008)(66616009)(66446008)(9686003)(6436002)(25786009)(8936002)(14454004)(478600001)(53546011)(6506007)(476003)(256004)(14444005)(71190400001)(71200400001)(102836004)(76116006)(11346002)(7696005)(7736002)(74316002)(446003)(76176011)(66946007)(790700001)(6116002)(33656002)(486006)(26005)(186003)(2906002)(3846002)(6246003)(107886003)(5660300002)(4326008)(66574012)(99286004)(110136005)(8676002)(229853002)(66066001)(86362001)(54896002)(55016002)(2501003)(81166006)(52536014)(81156014)(316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB3178; H:HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: BFFCGpsW1J6jN4WBdWcV68ULZ3jNEkAiZS9PcW6J3c4+JeduquApgbYdkwlOGmGA+o1dRFBnwu4O7r9CTiGWMjN3TkRAgeoQ63FH6un6mft6HzK7Nab45C7znz36XNNqfBvXa+//T0lGnJm1qDKVgi80W5HGpytXYb72JZRUEkgBXi8x0IrdHt8o0ZSWFTPoJ7KJrprHBR8tKkQGWcbLRfwZu9rrsK2NxPrhFloLGMAoEZvleAoixzHezvXUfH8eaHK4zJq2jsyBtmMW02YyWsI2kw36OqnrUQC1+1lCEXRLQFnsQQkKUlnVFhNOk/gK2OPMt41UTJxNyZbKbWjLifSwHA+2kO+P73YbwyZbHkqzmCwjWApkBniTotEGezQaLYwOvLQ11WOUqLE0E1Anf6uGh5w9SolFRzE+SBOCOtp28YeE9UUn/YIj1OT3BqGL
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02BB_01D59ECE.042D31E0"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 68010845-980a-4820-7b4f-08d76cdcc645
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2019 10:39:36.9942 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: d591jSDpwtFQoPOxx5b/VD9HApC2GR2/sq7JwEJ1a4FILwXvTCzAlUfoD4WQ5CAIs22HthgaWFNgil3tr8hn9JKXaI7jYLVUQn8mhfKoeRGfys3Hu7GyZ882LBb3f21I
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB3178
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/Pj3Nz6iFYjktt0JllNd6JPSh03I>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] How to handle remaining milestones
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:39:50 -0000

Hi

 

My plan is to drive an update of RFC8298 towards proposed standard status if
that is seen as important enough.

That update would also specify the L4S support either as implemented in the
example running code or some improved version of it. 

Still I would like to see more real life deployment experience, to get an
understanding of the possible outstanding issues that need to be fixed.

The problem is that SCReAM has not been deployed/experimented with other
than in a use case with remote controlled vehicles  and I don’t foresee any
wider deployment in other contexts for the moment. 

 

Question is if this is sufficient for a proposed standard status ?

 

/Ingemar

 

From: Anna Brunström <anna.brunstrom@kau.se> 
Sent: den 18 november 2019 15:47
To: rmcat@ietf.org
Subject: [rmcat] How to handle remaining milestones

 

Dear all,

 

As part of the WG status overview in tomorrow’s rmcat meeting at IETF106 we
want to bring up how to handle our remaining milestones:

 

Jul 2019            Publish first draft of evaluation results

Jul 2019            Publish first draft of Standards Track congestion
control algorithm


Nov 2019          Submit interactions between applications and RTP flows to
IESG as Informational

Nov 2019          Submit congestion control to IESG for Proposed Standard 

 

One approach for how to move forward could be to gather evaluation results
and experiences for the next 12 months or so (with meetings only if there
are results to report) and then evaluate the status and whether to pursue
further work. But the way forward of course depends on the interest of the
working group and the intentions of the algorithm authors. 

 

We just wanted to give a heads up for this discussion point so you all have
a chance to think about it beforehand, also as it is not directly visible in
the agenda as it is part of the WG status review. Any comment on the mailing
list is of course also welcome!

 

Best Regards,
Anna (for the chairs)

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Anna Brunstrom

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science

Karlstad University

651 88 Karlstad, Sweden

Phone:   +46 54 7001795

E-mail:  anna.brunstrom@kau.se <mailto:anna.brunstrom@kau.se> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------