[rmcat] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 March 2020 10:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B513A11E6; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 02:29:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests@ietf.org, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, rmcat@ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, csp@csperkins.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.119.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <158340417157.14587.15151002823564845589@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 02:29:31 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/SaVXcZGIaLLq64uJ0uhkG8h_fvU>
Subject: [rmcat] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:29:32 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Adam for noting the author-count already. Section 3 Different mobile operators deploy their own cellular networks with their own set of network functionalities and policies. Usually, a mobile operator network includes 2G, EDGE, 3G and 4G radio access Is 2G still "typical"? I was given to understand it was getting phased out. Section 3.1, 3.2 How do I tell how much time is "enough time to warm-up the network"? Section 4.2.3 b. Multiple RTP-based media flows sharing the wireless uplink:N = 16 (all downlink); M = 0. When multiple clients attempt to transmit I'm not sure how to interpret the parenthetical; is it a copy/paste issue from (a) that should read "all uplink"?
- [rmcat] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [rmcat] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draf… Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)