IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] Wireless test cases

"Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com> Wed, 24 February 2016 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756911B3964 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:50:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AuQSfCJjaThQ for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD8C1B3938 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:50:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1357; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456332602; x=1457542202; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=1Wl7ru/LGlArtg+wZ0ia828F+i3dCGqJXfiLQL5KqfY=; b=EoNVS5GyKFFgoPO+W7n96z44oTf3P3km5FAXGGBhiwdKdRe08awCmOXT UZR0QWiJWg1pIdS4qpG6TIj7I0vCniFgOjZeiYkZM6/Y1OC6RcS9Ut22d aeapIoQ2N2g61Mjn7AKTPm/UkcB9fTmoQ6LQfStriRn+7z975zliAFBfO s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AnBABT3s1W/4MNJK1egzqBPwaFfaYDAQQBjmQBDYFmhg4CgUQ4FAEBAQEBAQFkJ4RBAQEBBHkQAgEIEQQBAQEJJQ8jHQgCBAENBYgfvmwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVhhKEOoQFEQEchDwBBI1iiSUBjV6OdI5IAR4BAUKCAxmBSGoBhi40fQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,494,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="242019837"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Feb 2016 16:50:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u1OGo1Td011446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:50:01 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:50:00 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:50:01 -0600
From: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" <rmcat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Wireless test cases
Thread-Index: AQHRaNy/VapPwARipkaYL6fylYsp7Z8z0rMzgAeuggD///D6rw==
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:50:00 +0000
Message-ID: <1456332600778.99326@cisco.com>
References: <6902D83B-55B3-4D22-8B37-A71A89720DDF@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <1455913631142.29407@cisco.com>,<56CD9506.7080902@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <56CD9506.7080902@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.248.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/VavZz99O4Wag8sjUCPpGlJ-wGTU>
Cc: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>, Anna Brunström <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Wireless test cases
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:50:21 -0000

Hi Mirja, all, 

Zahed and I have indeed discussed about this in Yokohama. Maybe I did not make it clear in my previous email, trying again. 

Basically, to carry out tests in Sec 3 (Cellular Network Specific Test Cases), one needs to run it over a module that simulates packet behavior over cellular links -- just like for the Wi-Fi portion of the test cases, we relied on the Wi-Fi module in NS3 simulators to do so.  

What is missing is the cellular network simulator, preferably as a plug-in module for NS3, over which we can run rate adaptation tests.  

Thanks,
Xiaoqing


________________________________________
From: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:33 AM
To: Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu); rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)
Cc: Anna Brunström; Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Wireless test cases

Hi Xiaoqing,

On 19.02.2016 21:27, Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu) wrote:
> As for Sec. 3 on Cellular Network Specific Test Cases, would appreciate
> more detailed information on how to set those up, or relevant pointers/code
> on cellular network simulators.

Can you let us/Zahed know what exactly you need/is missing?

Thanks,
Mirja

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status