Re: [rmcat] test cases for coupled cc [was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-02]

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

On 2016-02-24 12:01, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
> Hi Zahed,
>
> quickly on this point:
>
> On 10.02.2016 10:24, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
>>> >I believe we decided already at the last meeting that we need to
>>> >adapt this draft to include uses cases for coupled congestion (and
>>> >that’s why we asked Safiqul to propose some).
>> That is what I can also recall but didn't see anything in the meeting
>> minutes so was not sure what we agreed on. May be missed it in the
>> meeting minutes.
>
> I guess there was no official decision of the wg to include text for
> coupled-cc, however, Safiqul volunteered to provide some input here and
> I don't recall that there have been any objections to include this. I
> also don't see how this could be a problem.
I didn't see this as a problem however I had some confusions and 
questions those needed to be clarified.

>
> I agree with you and Safiqul that we don't need to consider coupled-cc
> for all test cases; only where it makes sense (e.g. test cases with one
> flow do not make any sense...)
>
> If anybody has a different opinion, please speak up now!
>
> Mirja

-- 
Zahed

==================================================
ANM ZAHEDUZZAMAN SARKER


Ericsson AB
Services, Media and Network Features
Laboratoriegränd 11
97128 Luleå, Sweden
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
SMS/MMS [phone]
[e-mail]
www.ericsson.com

==================================================