[rmcat] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 March 2020 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9760E3A1552; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 06:16:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests@ietf.org, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, rmcat@ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, csp@csperkins.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.119.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <158341779259.14698.13465518871688161618@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:16:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/Znfv2ZOTLOGammELb-TZG1zQv3A>
Subject: [rmcat] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-rmcat-wireless-tests-09=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:16:33 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. It is really easy to read.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENTs and NITs. An answer will be
appreciated.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Section 1 --
Does the following assertion always stand ? "This contrasts with the wired
network setting where traffic flows from all users share the same queue."

-- Section 3.1.2 --
As a frequent high speed train passenger, I would have appreciated a simulation
with mobility of 300 km/h ;-)

== NITS ==

-- Section 3.1.2 --
s/10Mhz/10MHz/ ?