Re: [rmcat] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-11: (with COMMENT)
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Wed, 19 October 2022 22:59 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6CFC152574; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ng4fKHNwd-9a; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.mythic-beasts.com (mx2.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEDE1C14F749; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=Date:Subject:To:From; bh=v56dY3N9u03STKcF217sXkLv9XULPxrCz3a/pHebtRA=; b=Ld7kPXIZEVFk2y7flKPw5XftEU q8pgaISONLlJAuiU0Gcl8Ii52Ji2iCrj+Pj0IvvJJSbNlbxDpGgKtICwYFgeXxKq0IaSZgfa5O8iY P9cnp4knEk+A/hUGdrVb1eniGZeFuJbyzSsCViuyWQKR+NczuiDWbfJaljPxgLhOYI+xInZDSv/B6 34P3UkG/bcFj/PhScGtwmROb5s9vGzV0Cc2BWmsY/mZeVeUVu5rfHmtAp4HOLZzPLyqrKfaga88rd tnrVQmGCdroKegBn8a5gnOoLTg+8FIZueaMjl7tskRHCOzF4AIsW28gbWnxFwtaZaGVMLaGCAD8kt wfXJC7Jg==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=39840 helo=[192.168.0.72]) by mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1olI1g-003qw9-EX; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:59:04 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback@ietf.org, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, rmcat@ietf.org, anna.brunstrom@kau.se
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:58:57 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5922)
Message-ID: <FE902A41-D7F1-473B-A238-87E9B9467E14@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <166620341345.49928.3257794929819096464@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <166620341345.49928.3257794929819096464@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/_XX9DWDKdN4MoKi-pCsHK3QsvlE>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:59:11 -0000
Typo - likely “each frame has to fit into a 1500 octet packet”. Will check and fix. Colin On 19 Oct 2022, at 19:16, John Scudder via Datatracker wrote: > John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-11: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for an interesting read. One question -- > > ### Section 3.2 > > I don't quite follow what you mean by "frame of packet" in > > ``` > Assume > that video has constant bit rate and frame rate, and that each frame > of packet has to fit into a 1500 octet MTU. > ``` > > Presumably "frame rate" means video frames, not network frames. But "frame of packet"?
- [rmcat] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf… John Scudder via Datatracker
- Re: [rmcat] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-… Colin Perkins