Re: [rmcat] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-11: (with COMMENT)
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Wed, 19 October 2022 23:01 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1E0C152579; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UiR4ewfOQf-P; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.mythic-beasts.com (mx2.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2EBEC14F749; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=Date:Subject:To:From; bh=uQQ3NxsfoBf2SZ27ldopLuEcKyZHgw1uPqv9a8k5HdA=; b=ERV1lqulguyXjRh25Jz1mQmS1T o4Q12JpB9jyU0C+EzkQECuhCXG5Tv0EFOJesEavfTdUw6Je1/+bAZ7qR+9nDowMGxFChhFxUjqDG9 crSZeDdNv1DloAZy8aSbf6xDr4+NYA0IrdH1S8hMDOMjh6zD3vK4a0TEWFSzfaeYDswzVwko/i5/+ tl4IGiRHm10r2zvTQ7GCkANxYKocGLLlapZASJ1qBjpwspK3vC2uGO/ch8OprZ3FuFwkdHYp480Aj f0xrmVoJQhQADJvWzIFiL+mU6EoV8NXR7ZyVAIps8l5lkmDy5fddehbrqAfwrYwE4jkuc6m6KBUHl V9Xo1OOw==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=40979 helo=[192.168.0.72]) by mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1olI3h-003rFH-7H; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:01:09 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback@ietf.org, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, rmcat@ietf.org, anna.brunstrom@kau.se
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:01:01 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5922)
Message-ID: <67D48544-5570-412E-B6B6-29ADC3BA4467@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <166616138033.13085.11885861035025602627@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <166616138033.13085.11885861035025602627@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/bAOcppQGwvPBRrRf5fYI0ZT9-6Y>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:01:14 -0000
This is fair. IPv6 adds a constant overhead to the header size. I’ll try to reflect in the text. Colin On 19 Oct 2022, at 7:36, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-11: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for this document, while I am not a transport person, it was readable > and clearly written. > > I can only regret the exclusive use of IPv4 in the tables, especially for VoIP > where the larger IPv6 header could have a more negative impact. > > Please do like in section 3.1 for the section 3.2 text "The RTCP SR packet > contains the 28 octet header and sender" (i.e., specify IPv4 no IP options). > > Regards > > -éric
- [rmcat] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [rmcat] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-rmcat… Colin Perkins