Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message

Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 03:39 UTC

Return-Path: <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370441B2C3A for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:39:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTWV_vPRuCqM for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:39:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F6691B2C33 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:39:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iody8 with SMTP id y8so7168851iod.1 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 19:39:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tieto.com; s=google; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DRhxAx0F1+/chy0LAn4+YtnwvyEwlU5/kBI6XuZ4qD0=; b=AT6j1AgZIiaM6HQ7pmXEvtMhVpzva0yr0X9mBbwWvrNrDMTYlu6JGUqZW3QSswTDt1 +uK75XTIZ1vogSxLuiF63slFSsE9jBX/QBbfjiAJAmyVjFuUgHUx1gfKP+RnNMPDDNYc p71sVghhkcq33911RGnaJoCDvs6wbXlmToAB4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DRhxAx0F1+/chy0LAn4+YtnwvyEwlU5/kBI6XuZ4qD0=; b=NvEb44PUaEiafvw/oYPECPZxo5LReQu9njdmnfITMdDc00xp0jKccPmzubcF5mcs1F XYeQ8qwr1FGiI6P8qdSvAh+314T8xu3/MWd5n/eoi6ocpGL+uLXwGrF0VpR8vrP1ON4n fD3a1Q/QYw9eDcHXQR6GvUsg6fz86z1xIhg+6VRYEwiQ1TCyHVbZmhhhX1sDcPJDG/ar 5spVQnPuQANxOFtDDbfACzCDp70YOmXyN0GndEqnspcLxG7LKvGJd/Vi0XBMYb+Xm0xt wTto6v+wH1mpMvN+mEzbcm0N3Dms2kh7Zq5ddV3xIblrUKtn0U3JlcB57TS+fIINRuiP w/GQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk3LuuYFHduoqIaAGny3dwLsfJ+PIKu1Zvj2b6tGlBfnTWqlXK/bUXnKnWBOE9onruj1O9tvG1BlPAZT5E+n2cu6lGsj9UP7kZllaQ2R6VS7W9wwO0=
X-Received: by 10.107.170.33 with SMTP id t33mr27183806ioe.70.1446521969650; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 19:39:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
References: <0968fc16daeb4c7fe6e1a79acbb822df@mail.gmail.com> <0CF22346-174B-4106-9C38-057023B63FF6@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <0CF22346-174B-4106-9C38-057023B63FF6@csperkins.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQIHdchKA8zQ7qyOTfdlzse5aXzp+wMmpkoengOv6TA=
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:39:30 +0900
Message-ID: <f105cf870745dbf3da845b07fc201be9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-DomainID: tieto.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/dC_1_4EwpFaOGJxzycxHfT2NtNo>
Cc: rmcat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:39:32 -0000

HI Colin,

Thanks.

I think that you are clarifying that within the *to de defined'*
includes the option that we may in fact not need at _new_ feedback packet.

BR, Karen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@csperkins.org]
> Sent: 3. november 2015 10:30
> To: Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
> Cc: rmcat@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message
>
> Hi,
>
> I won’t be able to attend the Friday meeting, because of the conflict with
> PERC, but my understanding was that the group agreed to look into the
> requirements for RTCP feedback for the candidate congestion control
> algorithms, to see if a common RTCP feedback message makes sense, and
> whether the existing RTCP feedback packets are sufficient or whether we
> need to define a new feedback packet.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>
> > On 3 Nov 2015, at 09:28, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen
> <karen.nielsen@tieto.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following Stefan's presentation in the RMCAT session yesterday there
> > was agreement at the mike that we in the RMCAT wg should try to give
> > the usage of a generic common feedback message a try.
> >
> > It seems a prerequisite for this that the receiver (sender of the
> > feedback
> > message)
> > is (in principle) unaware of the particular CC algorithm that the
> > sender is using, but will generate a *to be defined* set of  feedback
> > information in a *to be defined* form that will fulfil the
> > requirements of all RMCAT CC algorithms.
> >
> > In order to start on this task we hereby solicit for the people
> > working with CC algorithms to respond to this email with information
> > on the requirements that they have to such a generic feedback
> > mechanism.
> >
> > In addition _or alternatively_   please (all) provide feedback on
> > * how you think we should proceed with this task, e.g., start a new
> > draft to collect this information (eventually to proceed in an ART wg)
> > * concerns with this approach
> >
> > We will try to collect the information provided and have a short
> > follow up in Fridays RMCAT meeting.
> >
> > BR, Mirja/Karen
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Colin Perkins
> https://csperkins.org/
>
>
>